[ad_1]
The prosecution directly criticized the Supreme Court ruling in the trial of Seongnam Mayor Eun Soo-mi, who was convicted of violating the Political Fund Law and sentenced to invalidate the election in the second trial. At the same time, he petitioned the court to sentence him to a fine of 1.5 million won, the same as the court ruling for the first and second trials. The sentencing of this case is scheduled for the 16th of next month.
In a trial held on the afternoon of the 18th due to the hearing of the Suwon High Court Criminal Division 2 (presiding judge), the prosecution said: “(Regarding the results of the first trial), the prosecution he appealed for an improper sentence for all crimes, including guilt and innocence. The Supreme Court argued that there was no appeal for wrongful sentencing for the guilty party, and the appeal court ruled that raising the sentence would violate the principle of prohibition of the change of disadvantages.
The prosecution also said: “In the first trial of the appeal trial, it was clearly stated that the appeal was made on the basis of a misunderstanding and an inappropriate sentence. She said: “It would be clear that the appeal was made as a sentence of injustice.”
The prosecution also pointed out that there is a problem with the case of ‘case 2007 Fig. 8117’ cited by the Supreme Law. The jurisprudence states that if you simply write the phrase “illegal sentence” in the appeal letter or the reason for the appeal, and do not specify the specific reason, it cannot be said to be a legitimate reason to appeal.
The prosecution said: “The media article at the time of this ruling shows that there were many judges who said that they made technical judgments and affectionate judgments for the defendants who were close to the passport staff. Did not say. She also said: “Please assure once again that the Judiciary is the last bastion of justice.”
In his closing statement, Mayor Eun said, “I have been working with all my heart on the investigation and trial procedures of the police and prosecutors from 2018 until now, and I believe the truth will be revealed.” We sincerely apologize for being sorry. “
From June 2016 to May 2017, Mayor Eun was put on trial on charges of receiving 95 times the convenience of a vehicle from Comrade, represented by Lee Mo, a former Seongnam gangster, for his political activities. The first trial sentenced the mayor to a fine of 900,000 won, but the second trial sentenced the court in February to a fine of 3 million won, which is equivalent to invalidating the election by keeping most of the court’s judgment on the crime. .
However, the Supreme Court rejected the court case in the July appeal, claiming that it violates Article 155 of the Rule of Criminal Procedure for the prosecutor to simply write the reason for the appeal on the appeal form as an “ illegal sentence ” and do not provide specific details.
