[ad_1]
Prison for the production of child sexual exploitation extended to March 29
Up to 6 years 9 months in prison for the purchase of sexually exploited children and adolescents
Journalist Jo Kyung-gun, Busan.com [email protected]
Check-in: 2020-12-08 09:34:27Revision: 2020-12-08 10:28:45Published: 2020-12-08 10:28:57
The appearance of the Supreme Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul on the morning of the 7th. Yunhap news
The sentencing committee of the Supreme Court (President Kim Young-ran) has confirmed the recommended sentence for crimes that habitually result in sexual exploitation of children and young people up to a maximum of 29 years and 3 months in prison.
The sentencing committee of the Supreme Court (President Kim Young-ran) released a press release on the 8th and announced that it had finalized the guidelines for digital sex crimes with the same content throughout the meeting the day before. This judgment criterion will be applied as of January 1 of next year.
Earlier, Yang Hyung-Comm of the Supreme Court proposed eight special weighted targets and five special reduction targets in relation to the crime of child and youth sexual exploitation (Article 11) under the Juvenile Sexuality Protection Act in September.
The recommended sentence for perpetrators of sexual exploitation of children and young people subject to the special weighting factor is 10 years 6 months to 29 years 3 months in prison. The recommended sentence for majority offenders is 7 to 29 years and 3 months in prison.
The recommended sentence for most offenders of sexual exploitation of other types of children and youth who apply a special weighting factor is ▲ 6 to 27 years for commercial purposes ▲ 4 to 18 years for distribution ▲ 4 to 18 years for child mediation and juvenile ▲ It is from 1 year 6 months to 6 years 9 months, etc.
Aggravated punishment is recommended for “ in the event of causing serious harm, such as extreme choices or family breakdown ”, but “ suicides and suicide attempts ” have been removed from the definition of harm. Rather, it is intended to block the possibility of being misinterpreted as forcing pain caused by harm or demanding to be a victim.
In addition, cases of full and voluntary disclosure regarding the full picture of self-confidence, whistle-blowing, and organized crime are reflected as special reduction targets, and cases of contribution to investigations, such as punishment of related persons. Through confession, they are reflected as overall reduction targets to aid in digital sex crime investigations. I tried to induce it.
Taking practical steps to prevent the spread of harm, such as removing and discarding sexually exploitative material immediately prior to distribution, or when disseminated sexually exploitative material is voluntarily recovered at considerable cost and effort, is recognized as a reduction goal. special efforts and efforts to reduce harm. They encouraged me to do it voluntarily. Furthermore, even though the victim did not want to be punished, the degree of reflection was reduced considering only the general reduction objective, not special reduction.
Even in the case of a first offender with no criminal record, only the case that the crime was not committed before the crime is considered as a reduction factor, and if there are multiple victims or the crime is repeated over a period of considerable time, it should not be considered as a reduction factor. A new restriction rule has also been established.
Journalist Jo Kyung-gun, Busan.com [email protected]
