[ad_1]
The Busan City People’s Power Party issued a statement by a spokesperson via press release on the afternoon of 19. The full text of the statement is shown below.
The preliminary arrest warrant for former Busan Mayor Oh Geo-don was again dismissed after last June. On the 15th, the prosecution requested a preliminary arrest warrant on the 15th, applying four new charges against the exhibition hall, but the Chief Judge of the Busan District Court, Kim Kyung-jin, issued a warrant on the 18th saying: “There is no dispute about the facts in general, and there is no fear of destruction of evidence or escape.” It is rejected.
Judge Kim’s judgment is difficult to understand. Article 70 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which was introduced as a criticism that possessors dominate the law (applies mutatis mutandis to the arrest of suspects under article 209 of the Law) ‘The materiality of the case , the risk of recidivism, the victim and the importance It seems that you have not reviewed ‘concerns about harm to the person of reference’.
Oh ask the court that dismissed the preliminary arrest warrant for the mayor.
On the 18th, during the examination of the court order, the Oh showroom mechanically repeated the contradictory saying: “I admit the charges, but I do not remember the situation at that time”, as in June. Furthermore, last year, the Oh showroom actually proceeded with criminal prosecution, saying, “I will punish all the fake news that cows laugh at,” regarding the allegations that Me-Too was surrounding him. Where did the judgment come from that Mayor Oh would not influence the method of proof for his accusations?
The sentence to be sentenced is a very important piece of information to judge the fear of flight. In the case of ‘forced sexual abuse’, which was recently added to the former mayor, if the charges are admitted, they are subject to life imprisonment or imprisonment for more than 5 years, and if the accusation is admitted, the personal information of the sex offender it is recorded and imprisoned regardless of the agreement with the victim. It is a serious crime that can be convicted. However, on what grounds did the judge decide that there was no fear of fleeing?
The Oh showroom was controversial by seating women from both sides of the staff at a dinner party, and the controversy over the sexual objectification of young women was rejected as a representative director of the Busan-si subsidiary and in celebration of the Week. Women last July At the events, women were compared to “flowers” to reveal a serious level of gender sensitivity.
In addition to the allegations of forced harassment that led to the resignation in April, the attitude of ‘acknowledging the charges but not remembering the situation at the time’ also referred to the three recently added cases of forced harassment, forced harassment and attempted harassment. . . In this way, allegations of habitual harassment have been raised against the former mayor. On what grounds did the court judge that there is no risk of recidivism against the mayor?
Furthermore, the victim’s petition, released on the 17th, reveals the victim’s cry: ‘I’m afraid to get rid of myself.’ On what grounds did the court judge that there is no concern that Mayor Oh, the perpetrator of a proxy sex crime, will do so for the victims and important references?
It is deplorable that the court can be so defenseless and partial in the face of sexual crimes of power. South Korean citizens, including 3.4 million Busan citizens, may feel contempt beyond the collapse when they see Mayor Oh, who has undergone a judicial review, again emerge from the detention center.
The prosecution, investigating Mayor Oh, refutes the reasons for dismissing the court’s preliminary arrest warrant against Mayor Oh, one by one, and clarifies Mayor Oh’s other charges, and urges him to reclaim the warrant.
The criminal justice agency must show strong will and determination to stamp out sexual crimes in power, such as punishing the mayor. Oh, keep in mind that to punish the former mayor is to perform real judicial justice.
