[ad_1]
The court dismissed the request for a temporary injunction against broadcasting that chicken franchise company BHC filed against MBC ‘PD Notebook’.
On the 30th of last month, the Civil Affairs Division (Director Park Byung-tae) of the Seoul Western District Law dismissed a request for a temporary injunction against the broadcast that BHC filed against PD’s notebook ‘Chicken War BBQ vs BHC ‘, which is scheduled to air. The episode will air as scheduled at 10:40 pm on Day 1.
Previously, said BHC, “The contents of the broadcast are mostly false and are related to matters that have been sufficiently tried in the past, so there is no need to report again, or because they are related to matters under investigation and trial. , the substance has not been confirmed. The contents are not of public interest ”.
According to MBC, the broadcast addressed the situation in which BHC intervened in the report of the embezzlement of BBQ president Yoon Hong-geun, the dispute between the two big franchises, and the history of the franchisee who suffered it.
On November 15, 2018, KBS reported the news at 9 o’clock on November 15, 2018, that BBQ president Yoon Hong-geun used the company’s funds as expenses for the children’s education. Two years later, last month, the Hankook Ilbo reported in the report that a rival ‘BHC’ had intervened along with the fact that the original informant A’s statement was revoked. In this episode, the PD Handbook covered related litigation materials, conversations between BHC and Mr. A, and the role of BBQ president Yoon.
The judge ruled that “conglomerates are also required to have business ethics and social responsibilities that are consistent with their influence, and the content to be covered in the broadcast appears to be in the public interest as matters related to the public interest.”
The Judiciary also said: “There were previous reports from other media companies and issues raised by the National Assembly audit, and at present, we can find data that the debtor (MBC) has neglected the obligation to confirm facts and provide fair reporting that you have to pay for as a media company. He said: “It is difficult to admit the need to ban the broadcast of this case.”
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
