[ad_1]
 |
| Justice Minister Park Eun-jeong at the Seoul Administrative Court in Seocho-gu, Seoul on the 30th, leaves the court after attending the trial on the date of the hearing on suspension of the execution of his duties against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol from the Ministry of Justice. 2020.11.30 / News 1 |
The external inspection committee of the Ministry of Justice will be held on the 1st to examine whether Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s inspection process is valid.
According to the legal profession, the oversight committee holds an extraordinary meeting of the oversight committee at 10 a.m. this day to review whether Yun’s oversight process is valid. Normally, the inspection is known to also discuss the level of disciplinary action.
This meeting is expected to hear the opinions of the prosecutor and the prosecutor in charge of the Ministry of Justice on the investigation method, results and measures taken in the prosecution process of President Yoon and decide if it is valid.
The content of the inspection meeting may act as a variable in the decision of the disciplinary commission of the Ministry of Justice scheduled for the second day.
Earlier, when Minister Chu changed the advice of the supervisory commission on the supervision of important matters to “optional” instead of “essential”, the influence of the supervisory commission was relatively weak. However, in a situation where controversy over Minister Chu’s own disposition continues, it is possible that the judgment of the inspection committee made up of a large number of external members can be used as an “objective indicator”.
The inspection committee is composed of 7 or more and 13 or fewer members, including 1 chairman and 1 vice chairman, and includes 2/3 or more external staff.
If the supervisory committee is unfair about the supervisory process and the measures against it, and if the level of disciplinary action to be decided in the future is underestimated, it may be to their advantage.
On the other hand, if the Ministry of Justice determines that the supervision is reasonable or if the disciplinary level is high, it will have a positive effect by putting the justification in the request for disciplinary action by the Minister of Justice Chu Mi-ae and making decisions. serious disciplinary actions such as termination and future termination.
Until the opening of the Prosecutor’s Office on this day, the noise within the Ministry of Justice continued.
Earlier on the 3rd, Minister Chu made a surprise review of Article 4 of the Supervision Regulation of the Ministry of Justice, saying, “You can get advice from the Supervision Committee of the Ministry of Justice on the supervision of important matters.” It changed the mandatory regulation to “seek the advice of the oversight committee”, but the “oversight committee approval” was controversial as the oversight commissioners were not notified of the review.
The supervisory commission date was also said to be held on the 10th, after the Ministry of Justice disciplinary commission against President Yun was originally held, but it is said that due to opposition from some members, including the president, the disciplinary commission was held two days before the date.
There was also a media report saying that the inspection Park Eun-jung called Professor A from Ewha Women’s University, chairman of the inspection, and asked not to open the inspection committee. In response, Park denied that “there is no such fact”
On the 30th, a day before the opening of the supervisory commission, it was reported that the Park party official did not pass the record of the supervision requested by the secretary of the supervisory commission. The Justice Ministry explained that the prosecution records are managed by the Prosecutor’s Office, not Park, and that related data will not be provided in advance when the Prosecutors Commission opens.
[ad_2]
