[ad_1]
The criticism comes from publishing an article in an academic journal about the research findings that there were only a few confirmed cases of corona19 among children and adolescents in kindergartens and schools (elementary, middle and high schools) where the Centers for the Korea Disease Control and Prevention Chief (KCDC) Chung Eun-gyeong. It is about deciding whether or not to re-enroll in a school. It is noted that the original word has been passed to first inform the public of the data and not use it for political decisions, but rather present it to the academic research community first.
In addition, in the second half of the year, unlike the period in which it was the subject of the study, Chung himself said that policies must be complemented in the face of the outbreak of collective infections. The accuracy and reliability of the survey results also raise questions.
Director Eun-kyung Jeong and the Department of Preventive Social Medicine at Hallym University School of Medicine published last year’s 12th issue of the Korean Pediatric Infectious Society magazine, ‘Children with COVID- 19 after the reopening of schools, South Korea. Korea) was published. Commissioner Chung participated as corresponding author (Correspondence to Eun Kyeong Jeong).
In this document, Commissioner Chung stated in this document, children ages 3 to 18 attending kindergartens and schools (from elementary school to high school) who were reported as positive for COVID-19 (Corona 19) to the system disease surveillance reported nationwide since May 1. as of July 12 of last year The results of the analysis of 127 children and adolescents were presented. As a result of the survey, 59 children (46%) were infected through relatives and relatives, 18 children (14%) were infected while taking private lessons at the academy or private lessons, and 8 children were infected in multi-use facilities (coin operated karaoke, internet cafe, church) (6%). Only 3 (2%) children were infected through school. In conclusion, Commissioner Chung concluded that “if the management system for the prevention of Corona 19 infection was prepared and prepared in advance, the spread of Corona 19 in schools was uncommon.”
Chung said the findings were consistent with reports from Ireland, Australia, and New Zealand, and these reports also suggested that schools are not in a high-risk environment for COVID-19 transmission among students. In particular, Chung said, “The evidence on the benefits of closing schools to deal with COVID-19 is limited, but it is costly for both individuals and society.” “The current data is under strict infection prevention measures in schools introduced across the country. 19 It does not suggest (suggests) an increased risk of transmission. “Rather, Chung also argued that” to protect children’s rights and meet basic needs, the public health intervention policy of the COVID-19 blockade should be expanded from the closing schools until achieving social values and maintaining children’s education. “
This is the result of a survey that provides the basis for the need to go to school. It was pointed out why the public should know the results of this investigation on Chung’s Corona 19 through theses. Representative Yoon Hee-suk said on his Facebook page on the 24th: “The problem is that Koreans have been exposed to the arguments and results of the quarantine officer’s data analysis through scholarly articles on these fundamental topics.” . By the end of october. The thing is, the results of the data analysis were published long before that, and then in the second half of last year, we should have released these results widely to seek wisdom and understand whether or not we should expand the class. “
Representative Yoon insisted, “In the process of establishing quarantine countermeasures, what kind of opinion did President Chung express about the expansion of classes to school and for what reasons, the authorities should clarify carefully.”
Consequently, on the 25th, Commissioner Eun-gyeong Chung said, “ Why didn’t you extend classes last year? ” And “ Why does the infectious diseases commander participate in the thesis? Journalists were also bombarded with questions. However, Commissioner Chung gave an answer that reduced the credibility of the thesis itself. “There seems to be some misunderstanding in the result of the thesis,” he explained. “The work was analyzed to see what effect it would have after the resumption of the school in the days when the outbreak in the community was not so great between May and July.” last year. “Commissioner Jeong concluded that there was no spread in schools at the time as a result of strong quarantine measures, and although the outbreak in local communities was not large between May and July, he said:” In the second half , especially during the third outbreak, schools have also occurred some outbreaks. ” Commissioner Chung explained: “We have analyzed such content and discussed with education authorities closely the level of risk to determine which parts of the quarantine measures should be supplemented and administered in schools this year.”
Furthermore, criticizing why he remained involved as the author of the thesis, Commissioner Chung said: “Since the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducts evidence-based disease prevention management, we have continuously analyzed situations epidemiological and we have made efforts to formulate policies. based on it. ”“ I am writing the article with the purpose of communicating with experts or other parts of international cooperation presenting it in the form of a dissertation and being verified ”.
In response, Rep. Yoon Hee-suk criticized the ruling party’s policy of quarantine and school back and forth in an article on Facebook again on the 26th. Rep. Yoon said that Lee Nak-yeon, the joint democratic leader’s director, should review resuming school attendance by discussing Commissioner Chung’s thesis on the 22nd. He said he was reviewing plans to attend school every day, but I heard Commissioner Jeong himself draw a line saying “There is a misunderstanding” .
Representative Yoon said, “It seems that the passport staff and the Ministry of Education were insisting on increasing the number of classes to attend the school without any communication with Chief Chung or ignoring his opinion. Is it or not?” He asked. .
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
