[ad_1]
 |
| The Chief Justice of the Administrative Court, Cho Jae-yeon, is answering questions from lawmakers during a national audit of the Supreme Court of Legal Justice and Judicial Council held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul on the 7th. 2020.10.7 / News 1 © News1 Reporter Park Se-yeon |
The ruling and opposition parties confronted the request for witnesses related to the suspicion of preferential military leave and the ruling of the Gwanghwamun assembly in the state audit of the Supreme Court of the Legislative and Judicial Committee of the National Assembly on the 7th.
In the national audit held in the National Assembly that day, opposition lawmakers fought a battle in Goseong in the morning over the adoption of witnesses related to Minister Chu’s son.
Representative Chang Je-won of the parliamentary branch of the Supreme Court before the start of the Supreme Court’s parliamentary investigations that day said: “Not all the witnesses requested by the opposition party have been adopted. It is too much to do.” Shouldn’t we verify the facts through witnesses? “
Representative Yoo Sang-beom also said: “It is to resign from the role of the National Assembly to strengthen the control function of the administrative and judicial power,” and said, “Chu has lied 27 times about whether the aide called the National Assembly, but he strongly insisted “I couldn’t prove it,” he added.
In addition, the Democratic Party rebelled. “It is still a case in progress because the power of the people, who is the accuser, is attractive,” said Song Ki-heon, a member of the Democratic Party. “There is no case of adoption of a general witness for a specific case, even in the case of a closed case.” It is not a place to check the morality of the minister. It is not a personal audience. “
Accordingly, Rep. Kim Do-eup said, “Science” said: “It should not affect a fair investigation during the investigation. Who else believes that the results of the investigation of the Eastern District Attorney’s Office are fair and objective? ” So please call the witnesses that the opposition party demands. “
In response, Democratic Party lawmaker Paik Hye-ryeon said: “By law, the witnesses involved in the investigation should not be adopted, even if they are under trial,” and “Because this case is not a suspect and was asked to do so. hired as a witness, Congressman Kim said he would examine it. It was an ongoing case. “
Democratic Party lawmaker Yoon Ho-joong, along with President Yoon Ho-joong, who had detained congressmen who had become more vocal, finally yelled. President Yoon said: “Request some witnesses that are not related to the trial or investigation” and “For an agreement to be reached, we must ask each other for witnesses who can reach an agreement and ask the other negotiating organization to make a request. . You will not do it? “
 |
| Yoon Ho-jung, chairman of the National Assembly Legislative Justice Commission, speaks at the National Assembly audit of the Supreme Court of the Legislative Justice Commission held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, on the morning of the day 7. 2020.10.7 / News1 © News1 Reporter Sung Dong-hoon |
After the battle involving Minister Chu’s son ended, lawmakers continued their offensive against the recent court ruling.
Representative Kim Jin-ae, a member of the Open Democratic Party, argued that ‘Poster 82 of the Seoul National University School of Law’ applied to the rejection of the seizure and search warrant for corruption allegations in the examination of income of the son of former legislator Na Kyung-won.
Representative Kim asked for a response from In-gyeom Kim, the deputy director of the Court’s Administration Department, saying, “Isn’t the poster applied without knowing it?” Saying, “Isn’t the poster applied without knowing it?”, Saying : “I don’t know if the poster applies,” saying, “I don’t know if all my former legislators and husband Kim Jae-ho, the chief judge of the Seoul High Court, are 82 students.
Responding to this, Deputy General Kim replied: “I don’t think that’s the part I’m going to explain, and if I still think that the deputy chief of administration could influence the judgment of the front-line judges, that’s not the case.” . He added, “I am a college student not only with former lawmakers and Deputy Judge Kim, but also with former Minister Cho.”
During the Gwanghwamun demonstration, opposition parties continued to bombard the court.
The ruling party ordered a cautious attitude about permits to the court, claiming that people felt anxious and angry with the permit for the Liberation Day assembly, and the opposition party continued its offensive that restricting meetings and demonstrations only existed in dictatorships.
Dong-geun Shin, a member of the Korean Democratic Party, said “there is considerable public anxiety and anger over the National Foundation Day rally.”
He argued, “Although there may be problems in court, it is necessary to carefully judge whether to allow (evaluation) in situations where (conditions) are not met.”
On the other hand, Representative Yoo Sang-beom said: “A country that cannot come together and demonstrate freely is a dictatorship.” “The Jongno Police Station uniformly prohibited the gathering of 10 or more people, and the Seoul Administrative Court rejected the (request for stay of execution). The court had tolerated the original blockade of Gwanghwamun.”
People’s Power Congressman Cho Su-jin also criticized “The ban on the Gwanghwamun assembly is a political quarantine.”
 |
| On the 3rd, the entire area of Gwanghwamun Square in Jongno-gu, Seoul is surrounded by fences and road walls. 2020.10.3 / News1 © News1 Reporter Lim Se-young |
Some pointed out that the composition of the Supreme Court was skewed and that progress on judicial reform was slow.
People’s Strength representative Jeon Ju-hye criticized that the composition of the Supreme Court was being filled with members of the Korean Law Research Association, the International Human Rights Law Research Association and the Association of Lawyers for a Society. democratic, which led to a code decision.
The former legislator said: “In the Moon administration, 11 people became Supreme Court justices. Among them, 6 of them were the Korean Society for Legal Research, the International Society for Human Rights Law Research and the staff called ‘Woo Kookmin’ from Minbyun, and 7 Progressives (the Supreme Court Justice) “. As a result, the Lee case, 100 years in political cases, such as the war case and the KTU case, shows a biased judgment of a specific orientation. ”
In addition, a former legislator, who was a judge, said: “I have been a lawyer for a long time, but the most confusing thing is the ruling of this governor.” It was judged that it was not a false fact as a whole. In the future television debate, if a candidate answered “No” to the question of “Is there a success, is it not a false fact?”
The opposition parties shared their voices that the implementation of the judicial reform was slow after the inauguration of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Kim Myung-soo.
People’s Strength Representative Jang Je-won noted that “although half of the Kim Myung-soo (Judicial Branch) take-over period has passed, the implementation rate of the judicial reform bill was 11.7 %, and only 4 out of 32 items were implemented “.
Democratic Party legislator Shin Dong-geun also pointed out that “there are few elements to implement judicial reform except for the removal of the post of superior judge of high law and the opening of the ethics inspector,” and argued that “control Democratic is that the National Assembly elected by the people elects the judges. ”
[ad_2]
