[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ In addition, the representative of the Democratic Party, Lee Nak-yeon, is sending a hand signal to a participant in the meeting of the Supreme Council held in the National Assembly on the morning of the 23rd. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
Is it a check or a civil war?
The conflict between Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol and the passport, which has lasted for more than a year, flares up again with the audit of the state administration. On the 23rd, the Democratic Party of Korea launched a general offensive, saying it was inappropriate for Yoon’s “comments” that emerged from the National Commission the day before. He also emphasized the need to establish a criminal investigation agency of high-ranking public officials (airport department), and said that the prosecution still reigns with unprecedented power.
Representative Lee Nak-yeon at the Supreme Council meeting held in the National Assembly on the same day, “The statements and attitudes of the attorney general, which appeared yesterday in the judicial commission of the National Assembly, paradoxically reveal why and how difficult it is the reform of the prosecution and how public officials should behave, demonstrating the legitimacy and urgency of establishing an airlift. ”I said, after that, he also left a” competitive comment “for over a minute.
“The Attorney General said: ‘It is illegal and unfair for the Minister of Justice to initiate the investigation and the command authority.’ The attorney general’s statement that “the attorney general is not a subordinate of the Minister of Justice” is no different from the prosecution’s statement that the unelected power will not be under the control of anyone. Democratic control has become even more urgent. It has also been confirmed that it is difficult to expect prosecutors to correct their mistakes. “
House Representative Kim Tae-nyeon also said, “I am concerned by the perception of the prosecution of the prosecution as a sanctuary, an agency of sacred and inviolable power.” He said: “The Attorney General does not seem to understand the basic right of democracy: democratic control over the institutions of power,” he said. He is the main supervisor of the affairs of the prosecution and is in charge of democratic control to prevent abuse of the prosecution’s power. ”
Chief Supreme Commissioner Kim Jong-min of the Judiciary Committee criticized President Yoon Suk-yeol once again after the National Assembly the day before. He said, “President Yoon’s harsh and political statements have reached a serious level,” he said. “This action is to lead an organization called the prosecution and launch into politics.” “The attorney general may have different views on the command and supervision of the president and the minister, but must be subject to democratic control.” Shake, “he said.
Another member of the judiciary, Shin Dong-geun, mentioned the suspicion that practicing prosecutors were receiving alcohol from former Star Mobility president Kim Bong-hyun in connection with the Lime Fund fraud case, emphasizing that ” the only alternative is air. ” “The door of the prosecutor is the door of the prosecutor, in which the prosecutor who has to catch the criminal is rather reprimanded by the criminal, protects the criminal and commits the crime, the door of the prosecution. It is clear that we cannot adequately deal with the crimes of the people.
One year already … who will solve the ‘Gangdaegang’ phase
 |
|
| ▲ Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol attended a national audit of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office of the Legislative Judicial Commission held at the National Assembly in Yeouido, Seoul, on the afternoon of the 22nd, and is in discussion with Democratic Party legislator Park Beom- gye. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
Even within the Democratic Party, there are voices that distrust the “extended war.” If it extends to Yoon Seok-yeol’s resignation, there is concern that the headwind will not be easy.
<오마이뉴스>Looking at the results of a public opinion poll that asked Real Meter on the 20th to ask for opinions on the second start of the investigation and the leadership of Minister Chu Miae, the exit from the ‘middle zone’ is revealed. Overall, the pros and cons were tightly divided between 46.4% versus 46.4%, but 55.8% of the middle class said “something wrong” (42.5% “something good”) and 55.8% (26.2% “something good”) was irregular. It was stronger (related article: Minister Chu invokes the right to command the investigation “Well done” 46.4% – “Badly done” 46.4%).
The mandate as attorney general is also a matter for the president, who has the authority to appoint, to judge. This is the reason why former CEO Hae-chan Hae-chan harshly criticized the accusation while in office, but not only did he avoid bringing himself up on this matter, and even tried to crack down on the group. Representative Lee Nak-yeon also keeps his words in a similar context. On the 23rd, Chief Spokesman Choi In-ho also briefly replied, “There was no such word” to the reporter’s question, “Was President Yun’s term discussed in a private meeting?”
It is a powerful prosecution versus passport and passport versus prosecution phase, which has continued since former Justice Minister Cho Kook’s investigation in August last year.
