[ad_1]
While President Moon Jae-in and Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun met with Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae on the 1st, the media is reporting on Minister Chu and Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s resignation or the resignation of Minister Chu. The main reason is that Prime Minister Chung met with President Moon and proposed resignation with Chu and Yoon. Currently, the resignation of Minister Chu is not easy due to the political environment. In other words, Minister Chu’s resignation theory is bound to be regarded as poor.
News 1 Korea (News 1) said on the afternoon of day 1: “President Moon and Prime Minister Chung also sang Chu Mi-ae … In an article titled” The Road to Resignation with the Emperor’s Resignation, ” “In fact, there is a story about Prime Minister Chung,” if President Yoon resigns by voluntary resignation, why wouldn’t Minister Chu also take his place? As it is burdensome to comment directly on the decision of President Yoon Lee and Minister Chu, there is also analysis that Prime Minister Jeong was carrying out a mission to find an exit strategy. ”
There is also a report that made the resignation of Minister Chu. On day 2, the Hankook Ilbo wrote: “Chu Mi-ae, who ran the day after the ‘chaperone resignation theory’, shows signs of an imminent replacement,” said: “The resignation of Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae has entered a countdown. ” The newspaper reported: “There are many observations that the resignation of the Blue House is a stage in which the resignation of Minister Chu remains constant and the moment of resignation is being considered.”
Representatively, two articles were mentioned, but there are countless reports on the mutual withdrawal theory. However, at this time, it is difficult for Minister Chu and President Yun to immediately withdraw. In Yun’s case, the court decided to return to the office. Will President Yun, who returned from decorating the front page of the comprehensive newspaper on the 2nd, resign?
In the case of Minister Chu, a disciplinary committee against President Yoon was scheduled for the 4th, with the reform of the prosecution as minister. This is expected to lead. It is true that it is a burden for the government and the ruling party. From the perspective of the Blue House, it is questionable whether it will be possible to overthrow Minister Chu amid the conflict as its climax.
The media analysis is interpreted as a speculative report with a hint that Prime Minister Chung met with President Moon and suggested the resignation of Chu and Yoon, ignoring objective political conditions.
According to the OhmyNews report on the 1st, members of the Sye-gyun Jeong Democratic Party said: “The accompanying resignation has room to be viewed as yangbi theory.” said. It is an interpretation that the meaning of Prime Minister Chung’s resignation theory lies in the criticism of President Yoon, as opposed to the interpretation of the media. At least these different perspectives and perspectives should have been presented.
Prime Minister Chung and other members of the ruling party have insisted on resigning Minister Chu, but the positions of the ruling party politicians and the president may be different. On the contrary, there is no possibility that the Prime Minister or a politician of the ruling party in place of the President, aware of the criticism of Minister Chu, would mention the resignation of Minister Chu. It is a ‘political act’ showing that there is not total sentiment against Minister Chu even in the passport with a commission in place of President Moon.
If Minister Chu resigns now, will he be able to find the right person to take charge of the current fight, be it in a fight with the prosecution or in the prosecution reform process? Would it be possible to bear the political burden of replacing Minister Chu and at the same time expressing appreciation for the Vice Minister of Justice? Will the ruling party welcome this if the issue moves to the stage of a personal audience for the next Minister of Justice after Chung Jak Chu’s resignation? These are questions left out by the media that heavily reported on the shared retirement theory.
In the media resignation theory, the focus is on Minister Chu’s resignation, but it is practically difficult for Yun to resign. Chosun Ilbo on Day 2 said, “There are many interpretations that it is impossible for President Yun to resign voluntarily in a situation where the disciplinary process is ongoing.” “He reported. In other words, it is difficult to satisfy not only the realistic reasons for the joint resignation, but also the legal and physical reasons.
President Moon said, “All public servants should only serve the people and fulfill their calling to make a better country,” President Moon said last month 30. “If we cannot escape past practices or cultures, we will have no choice but to fall behind the rapidly changing global trend.” But the media interpreted this as a circumvention of criticism against Yun. If so, President Moon criticized the accusation for the conflict between Justice and the Prosecutor’s Office and immediately considered the resignation of the Justice Minister.
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
