[ad_1]
Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae refuted criticism from the opposition party that he lied 27 times in the National Assembly about the suspicion of preferential holidays for his son’s vacation. I had a conflict with the members.
On the afternoon of the 12th, Minister Chu requested opinions on Park Beom-gye’s report at the Judicial Oversight of the Legislative Judicial Committee of the National Assembly, saying: ‘The Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office concluded that this case was not prosecuted in July and reported it to the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office, but postpone the case. In the process of responding, he said this.
Minister Chu said, “I would like to review it, but as it is my case, I refrain from paying special attention, but if I look at the report and reconsider, it is the day that I led the investigation against the president in the Channel A incident in that moment”. It was said that they had investigated people, and it was a simple matter that was not illegal or illegal because it was a legitimate vacation according to the law of command of soldiers, but the incident was amplified by the media ”. Minister Chu said, “It is quite ridiculous, and the novel does not end with a novel, I think you are trying to write a novel.”
In response, Representative Han-eung Yoon said in his order of inquiry, “I can’t help but be disappointed.” “I announced the results of the investigation of the minister’s son in the Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office, but most of them see the results of the investigation, and the investigation is too insufficient, there are many loopholes. Some say this was investigated by a normal prosecutor. ” Representative Yoon said, “Even if the prosecutors interpret and deal with it, the prosecutor cannot change the lie that the chief made to the National Assembly,” he said. “The video of lies remains on the internal record, and prosecutors who listen well cannot change it.” He accused him. Representative Yun said, “I thought the minister would coldly apologize in Gukgamjang, but it was raining until the end.” How strong do you have a heart and a shameless face? “
In particular, when Representative Yoon pointed out that “the number of times I lied 27 times in a month,” Minister Chu refuted, saying, “I criticized myself 27 times.” In this process, Assemblyman Yoon yelled to listen. He said: “Is the member of the National Assembly a writer of novels or does he speak like that, disrespecting the National Assembly?”
Then Minister Chu refuted: “If the investigation is wrong, shouldn’t we be right?”
When Representative Yoon asked, “It’s a matter that I pointed out many times, didn’t you lie?” Minister Chu refuted, “I didn’t lie.”
Representative Yoon told Deputy Justice Minister Koki-young: “If you look at the investigation of the Eastern District Prosecutor’s Office, the post-war situation of the KakaoTalk exchange, the phone number, the information reported by KakaoTalk, who did it for the Ministry of National Defense, the situation in which official documents were received outside the day of treatment, the support officer came. “Can you say for sure that the investigation was successful?” Vice Minister Ko said: “I know that the prosecution has properly judged the evidence and handled it without charge,” and said: “The prosecutors would have renounced that (own) honor and did not judge on that alone.”
When Congressman Yoon told Minister Chu Mi-ae, “It’s great,” Minister Chu also said, “It’s amazing. Congressman too.” “If it is not the prosecutors, you cannot protect Korea. When he said that we should not cover the case and manipulate the investigation, Minister Chu again refuted: “What are you covering and manipulating?”
Later, through a parliamentary comment, Representative Kim Do-eup, secretary of the opposition party of the Judicial Committee of the National Assembly, said: “This is the first thing I said in the National Assembly after the controversy over the lie. I screamed and blocked. “Rep. Kim said,” Before and after Chuseok, the controversy about lying in Chumi-ae became a hot topic, “he said.” By the way, we said 27 times. Let’s stop all the soup and check that it’s gone. “
Representative Jang Je-won also said, “If I had expressed regret at least, it wouldn’t have been more controversial.” “I am questioning the attitude of the response of the judiciary in the 21st National Assembly, how can you say that it was stubborn 27 times?”
In this regard, Judicial Commissioner Yoon Ho-jung said: “The controversy of the 27th lie was the point of the opposition legislators who started with the question of the government,” and said: “For more than eight months, the new facts they have not been covered with disputes, and the same story has been repeated. ” President Yoon said, “It is not correct to make the state affairs audit a place of political dispute without taking the minister’s words into account as a lie.” However, to Minister Chu, President Yoon said, “As the Minister of Justice has a lot to say, I would like him to give an answer that fits the purpose of the question.” “If you cannot answer, it is the correct position as head of the audited agency to explain why it is difficult. I think it is not “.
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
