“Let’s discuss” the Democratic Party Is the power of the people hurt?



[ad_1]

In addition, it is analyzed that there is a high degree of political vocation behind the decision of the Democratic Party not to end by force the obstructionism of popular power (unlimited debate against the Law of the National Intelligence Service) in a plenary session of the Assembly National on the 10th.

On the surface of the Democratic Party, the reason is “respect for the opposition.” Internal spokesman Hong Jung-min said: “We decided to respect the opinion of the opposition party to guarantee the declaration of intent of the obstructionist bill.”

While the power of the people criticizes the ruling party’s sole provision on the bill’s issue as “ legislative independence, ” there seems to be no need to give the impression that even the opposition’s freedom of expression is hampered by force.

Furthermore, the Democratic Party is relatively relaxed, as it is expected to safely pass the revised High-Level Officers Criminal Investigations Act bill, which was the first goal of the day, and to deal with the rest of the bills without much difficulty.

Amendment to the Air Transport Law

explanation of the imageAmendment to the Air Transport Law

▶ Click here to enlarge the view

Some have interpreted that the Democratic Party avoided excessive rainfall after careful calculation of the votes.

According to the National Assembly Law, to forcibly end the obstructionism within 24 hours, 180 members of legislators must obtain anonymous approval, which is difficult to guarantee based on the current structure of the hospital.

The Democratic Party has 174 seats, but 173, except for the detained Congressman Jeong Jeong-soon.

178 seats will be secured by adding National Assembly Speaker Park Byung-seok, Rep. Lee Sang-jik Lee, who left the Democratic Party, and Rep. Lee Yong-ho Lee, a passport-oriented independent member.

If three members of the Open Democratic Party are added to this, the seats will exceed 180 seats, but an internal exit vote may appear such as Representative Eung-cheon Cho, who did not participate in the vote on the amendment to the Air Transport Law. . There was a risk that it would be unknown if small opposition parties like (1 member) would help 100%.

A Democratic Party official noted in a call with Yonhap News that “180 seats are full.”

On the other hand, from the power of the people, a reaction emerged that it was quite affected.

It is due to concerns that the amendment to the Airborne Law, which was the core of the government’s government the day before, could only obstruct for just three hours, and that the effects that have only ignited the debate at the end of the day will not have an effect. significant and the power of the party will diminish.

The regret that anti-government public opinion may be maximized is belatedly raised if the proposed amendment to the Air Transport Act is somehow delayed following a disciplinary decision against Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol and an obstructionism on other bills. .

He is in this position to mobilize all available resources to maximize time, but it is not even clear whether skepticism from within will increase and pass this weekend.

A People’s Force official said on the call: “The Democratic Party has guaranteed every right to debate and I am concerned about what to do if I pass the Huller-Deng bill.

Rep. Cheol-gyu Lee, Unlimited Discussion on the Amendment to the National Intelligence Service Law

explanation of the imageRep. Cheol-gyu Lee, Unlimited Discussion on the Amendment to the National Intelligence Service Law

▶ Click here to enlarge the view

[연합뉴스]

Copyright ⓒ Yonhap News. Unauthorized reproduction and redistribution prohibited

[ad_2]