[ad_1]
While the ‘Judge’s Indictment Documents’, which is a key issue in the disciplinary action for the suspension of the attorney general’s office, was released publicly, a member of the Democratic Party Lee Tan-hee (Gyeonggi Yongin- jeong) said: “If this act is illegal (as prosecutors argue).” Any method of gathering information does not depend on whether the information is already public, but only on whether it is outside the scope of the prosecutor’s work, “he harshly criticized .
Representative Lee is the person who informed the world about Yang Seung-tae’s judicial nongdan by rejecting the court administration’s “ judge’s inspection ” in February 2017, including orders related to the blacklist of judges.
On the 26th, Congressman Lee posted a post on social media and made this announcement right after the document was posted. Lee Wan-gyu, a lawyer for Yoon Suk-yeol, who was suspended from the Ministry of Justice on suspicion that he was responsible for the judge’s inspection, said the day before, “I don’t think I’m an inspector at all. I’ll leave it to the judgment of the public’s common sense. ” <오마이뉴스>He first reported the full text of this document (related article: [전문] “No presence” … “Easy to respond to the accusation” … Document of ‘Illegal investigation of the judges’ published http://omn.kr/1qpx0).
Lee Tan-hee, who accused the court of ‘judge’s inspection’, “I’m sorry”
 |
|
| ▲ Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol’s Attorney Lee Wan-gyu Released Suspicion Of Illegal Judge | |
| Ⓒ Oh my news |
See related photos |
Representative Lee Tan-hee said, “It has been two years since the former Chief Justice Yang Seung-tae, who inspected the judge and intervened in the trial, was arrested. In the past two years, the same will happen in several state agencies unless clear standards are set through impeachment. I have screamed that I can do it. I am deplorable. ”
Next, “if the act of the relevant prosecutor (prosecutor Sung Sang-wook, author of the” Judge’s Prosecutor’s Office “document) is illegal, such as” how did you collect the information? “,” If the information collected is public information “, etc. It does not depend,” he stressed, “it only depends on whether the prosecutor has exceeded the scope of his work.”
Representative Lee said: “The prosecutor is not a prosecutor involved in the trial of a related case, nor a prosecutor belonging to the Supreme Court of Prosecutors and the Department of Transportation. The prosecutor belongs to the Office of Investigative Information Policy and its job is to ‘collect and manage research information.’ He pointed out that the reason why the Yang Seung-Tae Court Administration Office’s ‘Judge Inspection’ was a problem in the previous Nongdan court case was because it was done without authority in a conference room that was not related to personnel matters “.
At the same time, Congressman Lee raised the content of a specific document and said: “‘Does public opinion or the atmosphere around you affect you much?’, ‘Wake up late after drinking’, ‘Look of shame’, ‘ Passive attitude, without presence ‘and’ Response to the accusation. “Soowol” and “sentiments prepared by attending to the comments of the court in advance” are related to the information of the investigation.
Representative Lee also dismissed the prosecution’s claim that writing such a document was a practice, saying: “It was practice to say it was ‘frequent’, not that it was legal.” “There were some articles that said that ‘lawyers also get input from judges,'” Lee said. “However, attorneys are not state officials or government agencies delegated to power the people. They are not people who get paid for their taxes.” I drew a line.
Representative Lee said, “For two years after the arrest of former Supreme Court chief Yang Seung-tae, no clear conviction has yet been made against Judicial Nongdan, like the indictment of the judges.” It must be confirmed, so that this does not happen again in state agencies, “he added.
Representative Lee is the person who announced the beginning of the Nongdan court case by publicly opposing the “judge’s inspection” while working in the court administration office in the past. Representative Lee’s whistle-blowing in the Judicial Nongdan led to the arrests of former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Administration, Lim Jong-heon, and former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Yang Seung-tae. Lee, who finally left the court in 2019, was drafted into the Democratic Party during the general election on April 15 and became the first member of the National Assembly.
On the other hand, on the 24th, Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol was suspended after receiving disciplinary action from the Minister of Justice, Choo Mi-ae, on suspicion that he was responsible for inspecting the judges in charge of important cases such as the cases involving Cho Guk and the case of electoral intervention in the mayor of Ulsan.
The judge’s examination document released the previous day is a document dated February 26, 2020 entitled “ Analysis of the main special cases and public security ” and the origins, higher sentences, evaluations and special matters of the 13 judges and the presiding judges of the Judicial Power. The back is contained. Prosecutor Sung Sang-wook, Head of the 2nd Criminal Division of the Goyang District Prosecutor’s Office, Uijeongbu Prosecutor’s Office, stated that he had drawn up this document as a member of the Investigative Information Policy Office of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in that moment and claimed that “he was not an inspector.”
