Lee Jae-myeong “Disaster grants, even 100,000 won per person” … Submit an engagement plan

Ticket 2020.09.04 17:15

“If the prepared disaster relief fund is 8 trillion won, consider an eclectic plan that provides 100,000 won per person and endorses ‘targeting clamps’ for the rest.”

Gyeonggi Gyeonggi Governor Lee Jae-myeong posted a post titled ‘Last Appeal to Vice Premier Hong Nam-ki’ on personal social media and made this announcement.

This is a step back from the governor’s original ‘universal payment’ claim that the second disaster grant should be paid to all people at a rate of 300,000 won per person, and the party and government recognized that the ‘selective payment ‘was mainstream and they looked for the next best option. It is observed that it is.

Governor Lee said, “Since the third and fourth disaster support caused by Corona 19 cannot be avoided, we will provide universal support in the next system, but it is suggested that when calculating income tax next year, people with high income should review the method of recovery of the reduced amount of the tax. ” “Even after overcoming the crown, the economic recession will continue, so it would be good to think of new policies suitable for the new normal.”

Governor Lee also commented on his comments: “If the party decides fiercely, but it will continue,” the analysis says that “the party has broken the belief in universal pay,” he said. “It shouldn’t be done,” he refuted.

And he added: “Seeing the members of the organization accept and follow the decision-making of the organization that is not illegal and unfair as submissive or changes their mind is to deny diversity and democracy, which are the essential values ​​of the Democratic Republic “. If it is decided, it means that the party and the government will accept and follow it so that the policy can be executed well, and since there is no change in the belief in universal support, please do not misinterpret it or blame it for breaking it. ” .

Governor Lee repeatedly emphasized the need for universal support, telling Vice Premier Hong: “Wouldn’t it be much more meaningful to assess future generations of ‘increasing the government bond index, but saving the economy and the people’ rather than assessing ‘hurt the economy and keep the government bond index up’ “.