[ad_1]
It is controversial that the Central Electoral Management Committee is receiving a call for a ‘sincerity report on property’ only against Representative Soo-jin Cho, the people’s force, among the 47 elected proportional representatives of the 21st opposition party. In response, the People’s Power side argued that “the electoral commission is conducting a ‘subjective investigation’ of a passport while giving indulgences to Democrats in the same case.”
According to the policy of the 5th, Representative Kim Yong-min of the Democratic Party of the National Assembly, member of the Legislative and Judicial Committee of the National Assembly, in a press release distributed around 7:30 am on the 2nd, insisting that the election was invalid due to the change in ownership reports before and after the general election of the representative. If legislator Cho is immediately investigated and the violation is confirmed, the prosecution must initiate a judicial process. “In particular, Representative Kim said:” It was confirmed that Representative Jo Su-jin was reported to the Central Election Commission by the charge of ‘publishing false information.’ However, it is known that up to this point, Deputy Cho, who is a party, did not even know that he was reported to the NEC. It means that the NEC leaked information about the accusation of the opposition legislator to the congressman Kim, or that Congressman Kim obtained the information through another channel.
However, the NEC then called Representative Cho around 10 am the same day and said: “A report has been received on the property. Explain your suspicions. “After two hours of suspicion by a legislator of the ruling party, the NEC launched an investigation. Likewise, two days later, on the 4th of last, it was reported that” it was confirmed that the NEC has initiated an investigation against Rep. Cho. “A people power official said:” The NEC initiates an investigation within two hours of ‘Ha Myung’, a member of the ruling party, and is ignoring information about it. “” This is an political policy directed at members of the opposition ”.
Earlier, it was reported that the NEC received a report that ‘Rep. Soo-jin Cho’s ownership details increased by more than 1.1 billion won before and after the general election. Before the general election, Representative Cho’s property was 1.85 billion won, but after the general election, it was increased to 3 billion won after the formal property reporting procedure under the law. In this regard, in a related report on 28 last month, MBC singled out Congressman Cho among ruling and opposition legislators, saying: “We did not answer the reason for the increase in property.” At that time, MBC did not report on the increase in ownership of proportional representatives belonging to the Democratic Party.
Representative Cho Soo-jin, who was a former broadcasting reporter, said, “(People just before the general election) quit work on the night of March 5 and applied for proportional candidates on March 9,” he said. “I immediately served as the main spokesperson for the new political party. There was no. A mistake was made in the process of informing me. I apologize for that.”
However, it is known that there are no cases where the proportional representatives, regardless of the opposition parties, have been invalidated because the details of the property before and after the election are different. In the case of Proportional Representatives, there is no actual ballot, so ownership details are not released to the majority of voters, and there are no competing regional district candidates to oppose this. Therefore, it is the opinion of legal and political circles that the possibility of punishment for the enactment of false facts “for the purpose of winning the elections” is minimal.
The proportional representatives are determined based on the votes of each political party according to the existing order. As a proportional representative candidate, you present the details of your property to the political party during the nomination process, but it is primarily used to check if it is included in the nomination exclusion reasons, such as tax arrears.
For this reason, the jurisprudence proposed by Representative Kim Yong-min while raising suspicions about Representative Cho through the press release was about the case where the details of proprietary reports contained in the “ public information ” in the existing “ regional district ” they were false and sanctioned. Rep. Kim couldn’t even present the details of the proportional rep invalidation penalty.
In politics, as Congressman Cho persistently raised the suspicion of desertion, the son of Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae, and finally turned out to be true, there are observations that the passport includes “ugly hair.” If the prosecution, which was recently changed through the greetings of ‘Chumi Love, can take over the NEC case, it can summon Cho.
In related reports, comments like “Cho’s recent attacks on the government and ruling party, making it an immediate target,” “I’ll hate you because you’re yelling,” “Does the NEC say anything to the Democrats?” Ran.
A people power official said: “There are reports that the NEC has issued opinions on certain broadcasts that ‘may be sanctioned’, while a member of the ruling party said that ‘a report was received from the NEC’ and ‘the NEC is doing research’. It’s coming back, “he said,” Isn’t the NEC leaking information a ‘dishonorable period’? “” Even if there are no charges, the NEC has no choice but to be called to the prosecution if they accuse or request an investigation, “said the official.” As the NEC puts the ‘process of process’ as justification, it is actually moving as planned by the ruling party. “
Some point out that in the NEC investigation, all ruling party lawmakers who raised the same suspicion were excluded. According to the Democratic Party alone, the ownership of 8 of the 14 proportional elected representatives has increased since the general election, but it is not investigated.
In the case of Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Hong-geol, his fortune increased by 970 million won from 5.8 billion won before the general election to 6.67 billion won after the general election. Representative Lee Soo-jin from the same party increased by 630 million won, from 560 million won to 1.19 billion won. Fortunes also rose before and after the general election, including Representative Pil-mo Jeong (increased by 330 million won), Byeong-ju Kim (increased by 280 million won), and In-sook Kwon (increased by 180 million won). won).
In the case of the Open Democratic Party, Representative Kim Jin-ae’s wealth increased by 270 million won from 2.22 billion won to 2.49 billion won. Representative Kang Min-jeong from the same party also increased by 440 million won. Congressman Lee Eun-ju of the Justice Party also has a fortune of 660 million won before and after the general election. Additionally, independent lawmaker Yang Jeong-suk, who left the Citizens’ Party, increased by 1.7 billion won from 9.2 billion won before the general election to 10.9 billion won afterwards. However, the NEC launched an investigation with the people’s power, Cho.
The NEC is known not to investigate the content of a significant “decline” in the ownership of Democratic Party lawmaker Yoon Mi-hyang. Before and after the general election, Congressman Yoon had a fortune of 830 million won, a reduction from about 190 million won to 640 million won. The Korean Council for Countermeasures Against Psychiatric Problems (Jung Daehyup), led by Congressman Yoon, added 800 million won, which was not previously disclosed, in the accounting details that were re-disclosed on the National Revenue Service website. 31 of last month. Some of the political circles also noted that “the electoral commission could carry out a full investigation of 300 elected candidates, including regional districts and proportional representatives.”
Regarding the details of the ownership changes, Representative Cho was known in the position of “I will faithfully explain the related details at the request of the NEC.”
