[ad_1]
Kim Nam-guk “Admission Organization”
On the 7th, members of the People’s Power protesting against the amendment to the Air Transport Law are blocking Democratic Party legislators with Nam-guk Kim (center) addressing the National Assembly to the first conference room of the review of the bill of the Legislative Judicial Commission. News 1
It was alleged that Kim Nam-guk, a member of the Democratic Party’s Democratic Party, gave a “ cheap ” to a Justice Party spokesperson who wrote a comment criticizing him. The position of the Justice Party is that if Congressman Kim did not take action such as reviewing the comment, the Justice Party ‘threatened’ not to cooperate with legislation promoted by the Justice Party in the future. However, Representative Kim said, “I don’t know how the Justice Party has broken in this way by selling the victim’s request for an apology as ‘bad violence.’ “Is the Justice Party a shameful party that does not know how to apologize and reflect on wrongdoing?”
The beginning of the controversy was the revealing comment made on the 9th by Jeong Ho-jin, chief spokesman for the Justice Party. Chief Spokesman Chung said, “Representative Kim called our party spokesperson, Cho Hye-min, to protest the content of the briefing on the abortion crimes hearing of the National Assembly Judicial Committee, and the method was very inappropriate, and it made me doubt that the ruling party ruling party member was correct. ” “In this process, Representative Kim said: ‘If (the Justice Party) does not take the (desired) measures, the Justice Party will not help with what the Justice Party does, such as abolition of abortion and the promulgation of the Law of Corporate Punishment for Severe Accidents (Law of Severe Disasters) “. It is hard to believe that the pressure was exerted by taking the bill directly related to the life of the country ”.
The Justice Party asked for an immediate apology from Rep. Kim and strict action from the Democratic Party leaders. Chief spokesperson Chung said: “Uri Party spokesperson Jo is a woman in her 30s and a spokesperson outside the hospital. I also can’t help asking if I think it’s okay to be treated like a young woman, ”she said.
Earlier, in a public hearing on the abolition of abortion by the Legislative and Judicial Committee of the National Assembly on the 8th, Congressman Kim said: “(The abortion issue) is a matter that men must decide together, and the men must feel a great responsibility. ” Men in their 20s and 30s are curious about the evaluation and the look of this bill. “Later, through comments, spokesman Cho Hye-min criticized the government and the ruling party for not completely abolishing the crime. of abortion, saying, “I understand the opposition of women to the crime of abolition, but what do men think?” I will not mention the comments I made in the public hearing, “struck Congressman Kim.
In response, Rep. Kim said on his social networking service (SNS): “The intention was for men to feel joint responsibility for abortion as well.” It distorted the intention of the person asking the question. “In response to the Justice Party’s apology, Congressman Kim said:” Abortion is a social problem that women and men must address together. “It is violence that is that prevents men from asking for opinion. “He added:” A spokesman for the Justice Party also announced a distorted comment today, “he said.
Seohee lee reporter [email protected]
Subscribe to the Hankook Ilbo News Naver channel
Balance to see the world, the Hankook Ilbo Copyright © Hankookilbo
[ad_2]
