[ad_1]
“The Democratic Party should get rid of the Party Constitution and Party rules only when they are different from time to time.”
The Democratic Party refutes “This vote was only a procedure to gather opinions from party members”
On the 2nd, People’s Strength representative Kim Ki-hyun posted a post on his social networking service (SNS). Facebook Capture
People’s Power Representative Kim Ki-hyun, along with the Democratic Party’s vote to amend the party constitution and recommend candidates for next year’s Seoul / Busan mayoral by-elections, argued that it was invalid because it did not comply with the quorum as a requirement to vote.
Representative Kim told his social networking service (SNS) on the 2nd, “The Democratic Party voted 86.64% of the vote for the revision of the party’s constitution and received great support,” he said. However, 21,804 members of the rights party participated in the vote. It is only 26.35% of all members of the rights party, “he said.
Next, “Article 38 of the Democratic Party Constitution and Party Regulations’ ‘Party Membership Regulations and Party Expenses’ stipulates that all votes of party members shall be confirmed by a vote of at least a third of the total number of voters of the former party member and a majority of the total number of valid votes. “There is,” he said, “it was not valid because he did not meet the quorum, which is a requirement to vote.”
Rep. Kim said, “The Democratic Party is arguing that it is okay because it is not a voting process, but a former party member vote calling for a will, but it is just difficult sophistication.” I can’t help asking if there is a beginning ”, he criticized.
He said: “In the past, when Oh Se-hoon was the former mayor of Seoul, when he couldn’t fill a third of the votes, (the Democratic Party) persistently urged the former mayor to resign and launched a political offensive.” to revise the Party Constitution, but if you try to ignore these important procedural flaws, what use are the Rules of the Party Constitution? It will be less shameful to abolish the Party Constitution because it depends on the situation at the time. “
Representative Kim said: “Is it not the modern version of the 21st century, but the end of the blatant hypocrisy of pushing for the reform of the party constitution tainted with illegality and illegality?” “Representative Nak-yeon Lee and the Democratic Party leadership do not have a difficult excuse. He criticized:” I think paying the stigma of being a sexual harassment party with a clean statement of no-nomination by-elections is the shortest path to people”.
Democratic Party refuted “Last week’s vote by party members was a procedure for gathering opinions, not a procedure for revising the party constitution.”
Chung Chun-saeng, head of public affairs of the Democratic Party, posted on his SNS on 2. Facebook screenshot
On the other hand, the ruling party also began to refute this controversy. The head of the Democratic Party Public Affairs Office Chung Chun-saeng also posted on his SNS on the same day: “The party members’ vote held for two days from 31 to 1 last month was a vote conducted by office by party leaders, and it was a procedure to solicit the opinions of party members using the mobile voting platform established by the party. “That is, it was not a procedure to vote in favor of legal firmness, but a procedure for gathering opinions from party members to ensure political justification for the nomination for reelection. ”
“The only legal authority for the revision of the party constitution is the National Congress or the Central Committee delegated to it. Therefore, the vote of party members carried out by the party last weekend was a procedure to collect opinions, not a procedure to review the party constitution. ” The intellectual himself is wrong. “
“Of course, criticism can be made that he is trying to determine critical party issues through a party-wide vote, and our party must humbly accept the criticism.” “This is a separate clause from the party votes conducted by the party last weekend,” he added.
Son of sungwon reporter [email protected]
Subscribe to the Hankook Ilbo News Naver channel
Balance to see the world, the Hankook Ilbo Copyright © Hankookilbo
[ad_2]
