[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ Professor Kyung-Shim Chung, a professor at Dongyang University, accused of “entrance exams for children and private equity funds”, will address the court on the afternoon of the 10th to attend a follow-up trial held in the Court of the Seoul Central District in Seocho-gu, Seoul. | |
| Ⓒ Yonhap News |
See related photos |
Jeong Amugae, the younger brother of a professor at Dongyang University, reversed his statement in court.
Part of the testimony in the 29th trial held by Professor Jeong at the Seoul Central District Court 25-2 Penal Agreement hearing (Presiding Judge Lim Jeong-yeop) on the 10th was contrary to what was said earlier in the time of the prosecution’s investigation.
Representatively, this is part of the “investment in automobile name” suspicion. Currently, Professor Jeong is under suspicion that he made a loan investment using the account of his younger brother, Jeong. Revealed by the prosecution According to the contents of the suspect’s newspaper report, at the time of the investigation, his younger brother, Jeong, made a statement to the effect that Professor Jeong conducted a stock transaction using a borrowed account, saying, “I will say the truth”.
Jung Kyung-Shim’s younger brother “Because he was not in good shape at the time of the investigation …”
In the prosecution’s investigation, Mr. Jeong said: “My sister asked me to create a mobile stock trading account, so I went to the Mirae Asset branch in Bangbae-dong with my sister and created a trading account. online mobile stock “. The following is the content of the prosecution’s investigation.
Professor Jeong’s younger brother Jeong : “Professor JeongI installed the stock trading app on my mobile phone and traded stocks using the old account. “
Prosecutor Sewon Lee : “In the end, Professor Jeong borrowed the suspect’s name (with the name of his younger brother) and made an account and traded shares.”
Jeong : “Yes it is.”
Prosecutor Sewon Lee : “Is it all Professor Jeong’s money and stocks?”
Jeong : “Yes it’s correct”.
Prosecutor Sewon Lee : “Is it because Professor Jung’s husband was a public official who could not trade stocks and trade stocks on behalf of the suspect?”
Jeong : “Will.”
However, on that day, Mr. Jeong’s court statement was different than at the time of the prosecution’s investigation. You affirm that you created the account. In addition, he said that he gave him the password related to the account transaction.
Hyung-Seok Seo’s Lawyer at Professor Jeong : “I’m going to ask you a question about Mirae’s asset account. Why did you open it?”
Jeong : “I heard one of my sisters was familiar with investing in stocks. It’s called leading, first (investing) and then following. I could do that, so I went and did (account).”
Permanent lawyer : “Did Professor Jeong at that time, receiving gift investing education from an acquaintance, ask you to invest in witnesses according to the guidance of his acquaintance?”
Jeong : “Yes.”
On that day, Mr. Jeong said that if he couldn’t respond to the stock trading because he was busy, Professor Jeong would buy shares on his behalf. Professor Jeong claims that he only bought on his behalf and that the account owner is himself.
Prosecutor Lee Se-won rebutted: “The content that I said during the five or six investigations by the prosecution and what I said today is 180 degrees different. Is there any reason to reverse the statement?” Jeong replied, “There is no background. It was when the fifth investigation, it was in very bad condition,” he said. “At the time, I took a diabetes medicine and had some pressure, so I ate some of the nervous system. So there was a poor, inexperienced part of the statement.”
Jeong was handwritten with the fake query data, but … “I don’t remember.”
 |
|
| ▲ Professor Kyung-Shim Chung, a professor at Dongyang University, charged with “entrance exams for children and private equity funds”, will address the court on the afternoon of the 10th to attend a follow-up trial held in the District Court. Seoul Central in Seocho-gu, Seoul. | |
| Ⓒ Yonhap News |
See related photos |
At the trial that day, the “fake management consulting contract” written on behalf of Mr. Jeong also became a problem. Professor Jeong conspired with his younger brother Jeong and Cho Guk, the nephew of former Justice Minister Cho Bum-dong, and signed a fake management consulting contract with ‘Co-Link Private Equity (Co-Link PE)’ and paid 15,794 million in 19 times. They are also accused of embezzling Won. Corlink PE is where Cho Beom-dong was the real decision maker.
Earlier, Mr. Cho admitted that he did “false consultation tests” on behalf of Mr. Jeong as a witness at the June 11 trial. At the time, Judge Lim Jeong-yeop said: “If you say you received (money) for embezzlement through improper procedure, you may become an accessory to embezzlement even in the position of the lender, and if you received it as a Simple profit without knowing where the motive for the embezzlement came from, it cannot be an embezzlement in the business. “I said once. It means that whether or not Professor Jeong and Mr. Jeong have acknowledged that the money is misappropriation of funds for business is an important criterion for guilt.
However, Jeong’s testimony on this part was inconsistent. First, he said that he did not see the contract until he was investigated by the prosecution in the process of being a lawyer on Professor Jeong’s side. It means that they did not know the content of the fake consulting contract.
In the cross-examination process, the prosecution released the original text of the contract. Contrary to Mr. Chung’s previous argument, the name of the account and the date of receipt of the money each month were written in his handwriting next to the phrase written in the management consulting contract.
Regarding this, Mr. Jeong said, “I don’t remember what I saw momentarily at that time” and “I (know) saw that there was such a document during the prosecution’s investigation.” When prosecutor Kang Baek-shin rebutted: “There is a word called management consulting contract next to your handwriting. Didn’t you (deliberately) hide that word and see it?” Jung replied, “I have never seen that in my memory.”
