[ad_1]
On the afternoon of the 22nd, with the presence of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, the audit of the Legislative Justice Commission of the National Assembly concluded. One of the hot topics was the JTBC report. Kim Nam-guk, a member of the Democratic Party of Korea, cited an exclusive report from the JTBC newsroom this afternoon and raised the possibility that the prosecution had concealed the “suspicion of the prosecutor’s liking.”
On this day, JTBC delivered the news from an entertainment business scene in Cheongdam-dong, Seoul, that former Star Mobility chairman Kim Bong-hyun served alcohol to prosecutors through a report that read: ” A year ago, ‘the house clerk’ ‘Kim Bong-hyun and the prosecutors came.’ It is a place where former President Kim served 10 million won worth of alcohol to Attorney A and three prosecutors last July.
JTBC reported the testimony of employees of entertainment establishments. According to the JTBC report, the employees “came the prosecutors and there was a lawyer in the group”, “the secret chat room, the receptionist room and the waiting room were reserved for calling.” Prosecutors were in a secret chat room. “
The most surprising testimony is that “around April this year, the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office and investigators came to investigate the field.” An anonymous employee (indicated as ’employee 2′ in the press) said: “I came from the South District Attorney’s Office once and the store was turned upside down.” He came without a warrant and said, ‘Why did you come without a warrant?’ At that time, I was in the store. (Employee B) also brought a mobile phone and because of that, Mr. Kim Bong-hyun said.
In a later report, JTBC said, “Employees that JTBC met with recalled the time when the Seoul Southern District Prosecutor’s Office and investigators visited her last April,” JTBC said. . In addition, he reported that prosecutors asked if they were ever in the business as guests. ”
Representative Kim Nam-guk quoted the JTBC report in the state administration, saying: “(Prosecutors from the southern district) came to the scene last April to specifically investigate abuse by prosecutors. (The fact of the misconduct of the prosecution to the Attorney General) Was it not correct to report it? “General Yoon asked, and said,” I have not received any reports. The Southern District Attorney’s Office began investigating Kim Bong-Hyeon in late May, but it is not temporary to say how the Southern District Attorney’s Office conducted the field investigation in April. “
Next, Yun confirmed to the Southern District Attorney’s Office, saying, “Kim Bong-hyeon was arrested on April 23 and sent to Suwon. “(The search for the entertainment bar seizure) was related to the Blue House manager’s financial supervising prosecutor Mouma, not after hearing Kim Bong-hyun’s statement. (The time of the seizure and search) was before Kim Bong-hyun’s arrest. ” In other words, it is not correct before and after former President Kim Bong-hyun’s ‘prosecutor hospitality’ statement to the prosecutor’s office that the Southern District Attorney’s Office investigated the confiscation of the entertainment bar to uncover the shenanigans of the ‘prosecutor hospitality’.
Later, some outlets criticized Congressman Kim’s investigation, saying the JTBC report was misleading. The Chosun Ilbo, “Democratic Party Kim Nam-guk, who questioned” JTBC’s Oboro’entertainment for prosecutors’ vain “on the night of the 22nd … In an article titled“ What do you mean? ”,“ Representative Kim did a question citing the JTBC report, which in fact turned out to be disinformation. At the time, it was found that prosecutors for the Southern District launched an investigation into the entertainment establishment before Kim was arrested. “In a situation where Kim has not yet been arrested and has not made a statement of ‘entertainment for the prosecutor’, the Southern District Attorney ‘He criticized that it was an inconsistent claim that he investigated entertainment establishments to investigate suspected lobbying.
However, the title of Chosun Ilbo’s report is currently “Democratic Party Kim Nam-guk … 尹 ‘What do you mean?’ The expression ‘JTBC Oboro’ was omitted from the title. The expression that the JTBC report turned out to be “a disinformation” was also corrected as “a controversy about disinformation.” It seems a step back from the original sidewalk.
JTBC reporters are in the position that this is not disinformation. JTBC plans to additionally report suspected alcohol use on the afternoon of the 23rd following the day before. They are preparing for continued coverage. Notably, JTBC will specifically refute the possibility of the prosecution hiding the investigation, saying that the timing of Yoon’s seizure and search precedes the timing of former President Kim’s arrest.
JTBC’s legal team said on the afternoon of the 23rd today, “The report on the 22nd was based on testimony I heard from employees in the field.” “We will continue to report on whether the ‘prosecutor’s suspicion of drinking alcohol’ and the ‘suspicion of cover-up’ are true. It is planned “.
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
