[ad_1]
Park Seong-joon, along with the chairman of the Democratic Party, expressed their displeasure at Ho-Young Joo, Representative of the People’s Power. The reason is that Joo-nae’s representative revealed to reporters how the ruling party’s discussions on recommending a candidate for the position of head of the criminal investigation bureau of senior public officials proceeded at a press conference on the 13th. .
On the same day, Speaker Park raised a question about “the representative of the main house unilaterally revealed to the media the content of the meeting between the representatives of both parties on the recommendation of the candidate for Minister of Public Service.” I was hoping it would be achieved and I came to the internal representative meeting with a sincere attitude ”.
In particular, Ho-young Joo’s claim that “the hospital representative Kim said that the Blue House expressed its displeasure against the prosecution candidates”, he concluded was “a lie.”
Joo Ho-young “Agreed with the candidate on the recommendation of the ruling party and the Korean Bar Association”
 |
|
| ▲ People’s Power Joo Ho-young, the national representative, will hold an emergency press conference at the National Assembly on the 13th. | |
| Ⓒ Yonhap News |
See related photos |
That day, the main representative of the hospital volunteered to hold an emergency press conference at the National Assembly. “The Democratic Party insisted that ‘the power of the people did not cooperate or disagree with the recommendation of the Minister of Public Affairs and therefore inevitably had to revise the law.” He said, “We have set up this venue today to reveal that the Democratic Party’s argument in favor of the review is unfounded, and that it was only (reviewed) as a means of instilling an airlift that suits them.”
Through a press conference prepared in advance, he said: “So far we have not revealed any negotiations between the opposition parties,” he said. “First, the personnel matters are not disclosed in principle, and second, if the story that this person and that person is not allowed.” “I thought the right person could be harmed and eventually, as long as there was hope for a single line of negotiation, it was not helpful to reveal the details of the negotiations. However, he explained the background of the press conference of the day, “as the ruling party began to work to lower the head of the airlift that suits their tastes, now it is time to publicize some of the negotiations.”
“Since the launch of the Air Transport Minister Candidate Recommendation Committee, there have been behind-the-scenes negotiations for the election of Air Transport Minister candidates, and Speaker of Parliament Park Byeong-seok also agreed between the parties. from the opposition from the point of view that a new judicial body created by the National Assembly should be started and function fairly. I worked hard for active mediation in order to make a possible candidate. “
Specifically, he said: “We even express our intention that we can agree on two of the candidates that were recommended,” he said. “One of them was recommended by the Korean Bar Association.” “Then he said that we could agree with the two legal vice ministers who were moderated by the regime.” However, he raised the suspicion that “one person heard the response that the parties disagree, and did not hear the response of one person” and “probably because he did not like (the Democratic Party).”
“The Blue House and the Democratic Party want to be a judge … Let’s review the candidates from the beginning”
“The Blue House and the Democratic Party said, ‘I don’t want the former chief of airlift to the prosecutor,'” he said. “At the time, the leader of the Democratic Party, Kim Tae-nyeon, said: ‘The Blue House expresses discomfort for the former prosecutor. As the airlift is a symbol of judicial reform, what would the chief of the airlift as a judge?” He also said, “If you have a career that can do it and you are a competent judge, you can get it.”
“In addition to the candidates recommended by the Candidate Recommendation Committee, Kim Tae-nyeon also suggested several people from the judges, and some of them may be accepted once,” Park Byeong-seok said. The president of the National Assembly also recommended several candidates for the judges, and we agreed on a large number. “
He emphasized several times, “We have never blocked the debate on recommending candidates for the Minister of Air Transport in order to deter the launch of the Airborne Department.” “We tried to recommend a politically neutral and fair candidate for the chief of the airlift, who could command 23 prosecutors,” he argued. “The only thing we objected to was the birth of an airlift that was subject to power, incompetent and biased.” .
“The Blue House and the Democratic Party are prepared to ignore the ruling party’s negotiation process so far and appoint them as heads of the airlift after the figures that the Blue House and the ruling party had failed from the beginning,” he said. “We are nominated. by the Air Transport Candidates Recommendation Committee and we voted. Former candidates Kim Jin-wook and Jeon Hyun-jung clarify that they are already candidates criticized by the opposition party. ” He noted: “I believe that these candidates are not allowed to exercise their undetermined right specified in the Airborne Law.”
Instead, he said: “It is necessary to re-recommend the candidates for Air Transport Minister, including the various candidates that were discussed between the opposition parties and those proposed by President Park Byung-Seok.” If you choose as a candidate, you will not only face national resistance, you will also be legally invalid. “
On the other hand, the leader of the Democratic Party, Lee Nak-yeon, responded: “We are not putting a fence in advance on the range of candidates for the chief of the airlift”, when a related question arose in a press conference to commemorate the 100th inauguration on the same day.
