[ad_1]
Professor Joong-Jin Jin, a former professor at Dongyang University, speaks in the discussion on “ What is lost conservative politics, what is the solution? ” Held in the Assembly Hall of the Yeouido National Assembly in Seoul on the morning of the 15th, organized by the United States Congress Party, Ui Dong-dong and Shin Shin-hwan. yunhap news
“I never thought I would be here”
A different visitor visited the future unification conference held in the National Assembly Hall on the 15th. He is a professor at Dongyang University. Professor Jin attended the debate “What is Lost Conservative Policy? Although Professor Jin has been dropping direct bombs on his passport after the” Homeland Crisis “, it was a rare thing for him to confront United Party officials, who they claimed to be supporters of the Justice Party.
In the past, Prof. Jin Jeon’s “Bone Smacking Poison Party” was shot multiple times by the United Party. After the general election, he said to the unified party: “This party is a party without a brain. Professor Jin said the day: “I am not interested in the conservative party. “My concern is why the progressive party is broken in this way,” he said. “But I came to give conservative congestion in the eyes of strangers.” Professor Jin said he decided to attend the debate with the persuasion of best member Lee Jun-suk, the party’s leader.
Professor Chung Joong-Kwon, a former professor at Dongyang University, said at the Yeouido National Assembly in Seoul on the 15th, ‘The 21st general election! “What is the lost conservative policy, the solution?” News 1
Professor Jeon noted that the conservative camp should recognize the social landscape that has been turned: “The playground of Korean society is already tilted, but only the conservative camp does not know.” “The mainstream has changed. Those people (passports) are not making progress now, but they have more to protect than change. She has reached the stage of inheriting the vested interests of her daughter and son. “
He said: “The fact that the mainstream has changed can be seen in the corruption aspect of the upper class.” In doing so, we compare the corruption of power of the conservative and progressive camps. “In the past conservative regime, crimes related to industrial capital have occurred, such as El City and the Four Rivers Project,” he said. “Right now, corruption (progressive camp) is turning into financial capital crimes like Sillazen and Lime.”
“Aging” was the reason why voters refused to pay. “At the party, there were only Taegeuk and conservative YouTubers left,” he said. He said: “Conservative change and progress has increased from the 1940s to the late 1950s.” The progress camp is using big data, and this is holding the Taegeukgi back. “He continued:” The middle class has the idea of being “unable to vote for the United Party” despite being shocked by the hypocrisy and shamelessness of the ruling class. “He said this.
“I was thinking about having the first party. I’ll take it if I want to, but it’s not that good.
When they pointed to conservative YouTubers, they said, “They believe in ‘we won’ and deny reality, and then they defeat and appear. Regarding Assemblyman Min Kyung-wook, who is raising suspicions of fraudulent elections, he said:” We have to cut. I keep buying and sticking. ”
Professor Joong-Jin Jin, a former professor at Dongyang University, talks about the 21 general elections held on the morning of the 15th in the Yeouido Assembly Hall, Seoul! What is the lost conservative policy, solution? I am presenting a topic by attending a debate. Newsis
The cause of the electoral defeat was the “shadow of impeachment”. He said: “The main supporters were against the accusation, so they could not cross the river of the accusation.” People who acknowledged that the Conservatives did not exceed the accusation turned their backs on them. “He pointed to the former UNDP leader of Hung Kyo-an, noting that” the fact that the party was represented by a defeated launcher in the impeachment regime it was read as a message that the accusation does not recognize. ” “To be honest, I was alone as an opposition party”Very added.
The opposition’s response to Corona 19 was also a failure. “It shouldn’t have turned the national disaster into a controversy,” he said. “He should have said he would fight Corona with the government. Then it would have been better if he had pointed to the government’s flexible response.”
Regarding the recent Memory of Justice regime controversy, “Lee Yong-soo says the 386 movement is wrong, but the United Nations is saying,” Open the book, “he said.” I wasn’t doing that because I had to hitting the 386 movement, which spread throughout society, which was not helpful. ”
Professor Jin said: “I want to recommend the republican ideology” on the path of the conservative party. The idea is to give the public the perception that the party is pursuing the “public domain” rather than the private interest. Thus “Don’t do a little trick, stick with Wincheek.”Said.
Professor Jin said: “These people (passport personnel) seek the public interest while talking about the public interest.” They brought the framework of the situation in the homeland to the justice group (memory regiment of justice). Yoon Mi-hyang (along with the Citizens Party) did not homogenize his country with himself (like the pro-Japanese) and framed it. “Regarding party experts, he advised:” You should no longer shout at the warriors of industrialization and anti-communist warriors, but be prepared to transfer power to the 20th and 40th generations. ”
Reporter Son Kuk-hee [email protected]
[ad_2]
