[ad_1]
Only 13% of respondents said they had “leadership” in the Nikkei survey
Corona response 19 “Not rated” 50% or more in all surveys
Lower Cabinet Approval Ratings
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe. Reuters Yonhap News
A survey by Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe showed that the “leadership” rating was the lowest since the second round of power in 2012.
On 8 and 10 days, a telephone survey was conducted of 1,165 voters across the country (based on respondents), and among the 49% who responded that they supported the Abe Cabinet, only 13% said it was “due to leadership ” Since Prime Minister Abe took office a second time in late 2012, he is the lowest “leadership element” in this newspaper poll. Among respondents who did not support Cabinet Abe (42%), the “non-leadership” ratio was 35%, an increase of 16% from the previous survey in March. It is the highest since the launch of Abe’s second regime.
In most Japanese polls, the main reason for those who supported Prime Minister Abe in the past was “skill” as “leadership”. Non-supporters often pointed to the “morality” aspect, as “because they couldn’t be trusted.” That is why the results of this survey are quite unusual.
The recent trend in public opinion is related to the growing number of citizens who negatively evaluate the Abe government’s response to Corona19. In this survey, the response from the Japanese government’s overall response to Corona 19 was “not positive” (55%), 11 percentage points more than the previous survey. Those who answered “(positively) evaluate” were 38%, 9 percentage points less than in the previous survey.
More than 50% of the Abe government’s response to corona19 was negatively evaluated in a recent Japanese survey. 58% of the Japanese government responded “not positively” to Corona 19’s response in telephone surveys announced the day after receiving 1,132 voters nationwide on the 8th and 10th. On the news network channel (FNN) Right-facing (TV) and telephone surveys involving 1057 people on days 9 and 10, 57% said the government did not “evaluate” Corona’s response19. In a telephone survey conducted 8-10, 57% of the 1,219 respondents said they do not “evaluate” the government’s response.
It was also pointed out that, amid the worst public opinion, the Abe government followed the “action plan seven years ago”, which did not presuppose a massive virus scan, in the situation of Corona 19. On day 11, the government The Japanese established an “Action Plan” in preparation for the epidemic in 2013, and the plan originally had no idea that a large number of Fisiar tests (amplification of the PCR · gene) were performed to confirm virus infection. The action plan, written seven years ago, said: “Reduce the epidemic to ensure the medical system and the time to make vaccines.” This plan was the basis of the Japanese government’s response to Corona 19. An official from an unidentified government official said in the newspaper: “The plan was to see all infected people as a new influenza infection and to administer treatment medications such as Tamiflu. “There was no discussion about mass testing in the absence of medications and symptoms of treatment,” he said.
Following the lack of inspections, the Abe government promised to expand the inspections, but the response rate in the field has been very slow. Prime Minister Abe proposed last month 6 that he would increase his ability to inspect fisheries to 20,000 per day, but by the end of last month, he had secured more than 15,000 inspections. The actual number of inspections currently stands at around 8,000 per day.
However, Abe’s Cabinet approval rate was 49% in the poll, compared to 48% in the March poll. In the survey, 42% of respondents said “support”, the same as last month’s survey. It seems to be due to public sentiment that he was unable to find a clear alternative to the PLD government. In the poll, 34% of respondents said they supported the Liberal Democratic Party, and the opposition 1st Constitutional Democratic Party only supported 4%. The most frequent response was 44% of “nowhere to support”. Correspondent, Tokyo / Jogiwon [email protected]
[ad_2]
