[ad_1]
It is noted that it is not unusual for the opposition party to criticize Choi Jae-sung, political director of the Blue House, and suspect a preferential vacation for the son of the Minister of Justice, Chu Mi-ae. He also said there was no point in delaying the prosecution’s investigation.
It is a somewhat distant view of the ruling party, which has moved closer to the position of Minister Chu’s son.
Chief Choi Jae-seong appeared on JTBC’s ‘Newsroom’ on the night of the 15th, answering whether the controversy over Minister Chu’s son is a resistance to the reform of the prosecution service or a matter of justice. Regarding the nature of this case, Choi diagnosed: “First of all, it is whether or not he has violated regulations or laws in terms of legal terms, and the other is whether he had privileges or benefits for being the head of the Minister of Justice of the party representative “. In the case of legal matters, he said, “Minister Chu Mi-ae, who could be criticized as an investigation guide, has been ‘restricted’, and the response is to observe the fastest and most accurate investigation by the prosecution.”
When asked by host Seo Bok-hyun if there was an opinion on whether it was about resistance or fairness in the prosecution reform, Choi replied, “There is a corner that is difficult to specify just as a matter of prosecution reform. “and” Is it part of the report of the soldier on guard? ” “The attitude of the opposition party is to point out, criticize and try to identify the essence of this kind of thing,” said Choi. “There is nothing strange about it, and I do not want to say that it is a reform of the prosecution service.” Revealed.
Regarding the reason why the Blue House remained silent on the issue of the license of Minister Chu’s son, Choi said: “The reality of this matter is revealed by the investigation of the prosecution, and that is the beginning and the end. , and if there is any preferential treatment even if there are no problems with the laws or regulations. It’s a side, “he explained.” It is not reasonable to mention more in the investigation of the prosecution. “
However, in the case of former Minister Cho Kuk, the part to be clarified or announced was revealed, but noting that it was different at that time, Choi said: “In the case of the Minister of the Homeland, before being appointed, the investigation of the prosecution has just been carried out extensively and the wife is prosecuted. He said: “However, since I went from senior official to minister, I was commented on the issues raised during the senior official’s days, and the issue of Minister Chu’s son was a problem that arose during his tenure as minister, so I did not I mention the matter mentioned by the Blue House. I did not do it “.
Accordingly, presenter Seo Bok-hyun reported that it was explained that a high-ranking Blue House official had found a professor recommending the appointment regarding the subpoena issue raised before and after the appointment of former Minister Cho. Furthermore, during the investigation, Political Director Kang Ki-jeong refuted that there were times when he said, “I asked for a quiet investigation, but the prosecution did not listen.” Later, Chief Choi said, “At that time, there were conversations that arose while responding to the reporter or officials, but it is an issue that the Blue House could not take an official position on the related issue.” “It is my memory that the Blue House officially mentioned the issue of the Minister of the Homeland. There isn’t, ”he repeatedly emphasized.
Responding to criticism that the conclusion of the investigation has not come out in eight months, Chief Choi said: “This is an environment where evidence cannot be destroyed or the case itself is distorted, and it is a concern. very important”. “This is my personal opinion, but I understand why the prosecution comes so late. There is a part that does not go, “he criticized. Chief Choi emphasized, “At this point, the answer is to investigate quickly, investigate accurately, and conclude.”
Regarding Prime Minister Chung Sye-gyun’s controversy over Minister Chu’s son, CEO Choi said, “In the case of Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun, I spoke in a different place, and the expression ‘I am ashamed.’ he is responsible for the entire political sphere and government. “I am very sorry to people for this workshop itself, and I heard you were speaking in this way.”
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
