Is Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun the commissioner of ‘Suk-yeol Yoon’? … Blue House “Not true”



[ad_1]


The Blue House denied this, as Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun was reportedly discussing the “conflict between Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae and Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol” with Cheong Wa Dae’s chief of human resources. , Kim Oe-sook.

On the 16th, JoongAng Ilbo said in the cover headline (discussed within Kim Oe-sook’s convocation of ‘Chu-Yun Haebop’ by Jeong Sye-gyun), “Prime Minister Jung, leading a commission, asked him to President Moon to openly and firmly demand Yoon’s (Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol) difficulties. A scenario that takes the form of accepting this is discussed ”. As part of that, Prime Minister Jeong recently called Kim Oe-sook, the head of the Blue House, to report on current issues.

From this report, a report was followed that discussed the possibility of some kind of ‘scenario’ for President Yoon Suk-yeol. Prime Minister Chung’s recent comment, “If the unnecessary controversy continues in the future, he will not reject the role of the prime minister,” which appears to be leveraging the role theory. At a press conference on the 300th of his inauguration on the 11th, Prime Minister Chung responded to a question about the role of the prime minister in relation to the conflict between Minister of Justice Chu Miae and Attorney General Yoon Seok- yeol.

▲ A view of the Blue House.  Photo = Reporter Cho Hyun-ho
▲ A view of the Blue House. Photo = Reporter Cho Hyun-ho

The Blue House immediately denied it. Blue House spokesman Kang Min-seok told reporters on the 16th that “the report on the cover of the JoongAng Ilbo is not true.” There is also an opinion that it is unreasonable to link the meeting of the chief of staff with the Prime Minister with Yoon’s decision. Chief Kim said that whenever there was a pending issue, he would meet with Prime Minister Jeong on an irregular basis or report on personnel matters.

Some point out that Prime Minister Chung’s impeachment proposal itself is unrealistic. Under the Korean Constitution (Article 87), the Prime Minister may propose to the President that the “member of the Council of State” be removed from office, but the Attorney General is not a member of the Council of State. The Law on the Prosecutor’s Office (article 34) only requires the President to appoint the Attorney General at the request of the Minister of Justice, but does not specify the power of dismissal. Under the constitution, the president has the right to appoint public officials, but observes that the possibility of unjustifiably dismissing the attorney general, who is guaranteed a two-year term by law, predominates.

Some interpret that Prime Minister Chung and Chief Kim have discussed reorganization in the future. In relation to the re-election and re-election elections next year, the possibility is foreseen for the Minister of Small and Medium Enterprises, Young-seon Business Park, to run for mayor of Seoul. There are also strong rumors about the Minister of Gender and Family Equality Lee Jeong-ok, who expressed the suspicion of sexual violence by heads of local governments in the passport as’ an opportunity for gender-sensitive group learning for all people’. The Blue House, however, has been struggling with reorganization and personnel issues until now.

Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.




[ad_2]