Instructor of North Korea’s first attack? … Tae Young-ho, who experienced 10 hours of obstruction



[ad_1]

People’s Strength Representative Tae Young-ho is holding an unlimited debate on the amendment to the South-North Relations Development Act (also known as the North Korean War Elimination Act) in the National Assembly on Day 13. News 1

“My colleagues from the North Korean diplomats and the Unification Front workers (executives) in Pyongyang will be watching the obstructionism on the Internet and wondering what kind of discussions I will have.”

Last day 13 at 8:59 p.m. Tae Young-ho, a former North Korean diplomat, as the first participant to oppose the amendment to the South-North Relations Development Act with the aim of banning the war against North Korea, stood on remarks in the conference room. main lectures. After getting lucky, saying, “I will try to solve the problem of peace and reunification with the market principle,” the blue background PowerPoint (PPT) appeared on the big screen in the main conference room. In Chapter 242 of the PPT, which he wrote himself, there were 13 reasons why Congressman Tae opposes the law prohibiting the war against North Korea.

Power Point (PPT) written by Rep. Tae Young-ho on the 13th, preparing a filibuster against the amendment to the South-North Relations Development Act (the Anti-North Korea War Prohibition Act). TV capture of the National Assembly

In 10 hours and 2 minutes, Kim’s top three inheritance issues

As for the explanation of Representative Tae, who opposes the law of war against North Korea, the force of the people even evaluated that “the curriculum is like a well-organized North Korean studies conference.” He emphasized that “the prohibition of the war against North Korea prevents the North Korean people from coming into contact with the spirit of freedom, equality and democracy,” he criticized as “a law that makes North Koreans live as slaves forever by taking over the hand of the Kim Jong-un regime. ” In the discussion that lasted 10 hours and 2 minutes until the morning of the 14th, Representative Tae pointed out not only the reasons for the opposition to the prohibition of the war against North Korea, but also the history and problems of the ‘three successors by Kim Il-sung, Kim Jong-il and Kim Jong-un ‘. Representative Tae said it was the dimension that his argument against the war ban on North Korea could be convincing only if it accurately explained the reality of North Korea.

Representative Tae Young-ho is receiving encouragement from his fellow lawmakers after having an unlimited discussion on the amendment to the Inter-Korean Relations Development Law in the National Assembly on the 14th. Yunhap news

‘Frontline Passion’ But Controversy Over Blasphemy

Members of People’s Strength sent encouragement to Representative Tae, who stepped off the podium after finishing the filibuster. The discussion time was also the second longest after representative Yoon Hee-suk from the same match, who set the record for longest time with 12 hours and 47 minutes. After exile in Korea four years ago, the persistent experience of the first experience of the systemic opposition party’s legislative deterrence system in a democratic state remained the same.

However, there was also a sad point. Rep. Song Young-gil, who followed the Democratic Party filibuster runner after Tae, said: “It is a very special case to become a member of the National Assembly of the Republic of Korea after 4 years of North Korea.” “I need to give it to me,” he said indirectly. During his remarks, Rep. Tae said, “I don’t broadcast like ‘Yai Kim Jong-un die, that XX’ in the area around the armistice line,” and received criticism from the Democratic Party.

Jihyun Kim reporter

You can also see the Naver Et news edited by Hankook Ilbo.
Subscribe at Play Kiosco




[ad_2]