[ad_1]
Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae will address the Gwacheon Government Complex on the 27th of last month. Yunhap news
A practicing prosecutor demanded the exclusive resignation of the Minister of Justice, Chu Mi-ae. This is the first time that the resignation of the prosecution has been requested. In politics, the theory of mutual withdrawal has been discussed between Minister Chu and Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol.
On the 1st, Jang Jin-young, the Daejeon District Prosecutor’s Office and the Cheonan District Prosecutor’s Office published an article titled “Minister Chu Mi-ae, please resign only” on the prosecution’s internal communication network, ‘Eprus ‘.
Prosecutor Jang urged: “Since the minister no longer has the qualifications and ability to promote genuine judicial reform, please do not distort or mislead the meaning of genuine judicial reform against the people and resign from the ministerial office for reform. genuine judicial “.
In an article for the day, Prosecutor Chang revealed seven reasons why Minister Chu should resign alone.
Prosecutor Jang said, “Although the minister is obliged to inform the people of the true meaning of the prosecution reform, the minister misled the public as a genuine prosecution reform while promoting the prosecution reform to take control of the prosecution hiding the investigation against the regime and putting democratic control at the forefront. They abused their authority, “he criticized.
Furthermore, “as the highest head of the Ministry of Justice, although he had to respect the rule of law more than anyone else, he ignored the rule of law by ignoring the rules of law and hastily reviewing the inspection regulations, pretending to be dishonest and requesting disciplinary measures against the president’s president. ”He pointed.
In addition, Prosecutor Jang noted that ▶ neglect of the entire work with the criminal justice system ▶ nullification of the violation of the obligations of political neutrality with the attorney general ▶ separation between the people and members of the prosecution ▶ violation of the obligations of political neutrality, noting that Minister Chu abused the minister’s authority.
Prosecutor Jang said, “Ministers no longer have the qualifications and capacity to promote genuine judicial reform, even with the contents listed above by front-line prosecutors that are insufficient in various ways.”
He wrote: “It has been revealed that the reform of the prosecution that the minister already dreams of is to make the prosecution more complete and direct through the personnel rights and supervisory rights granted to the minister.”
Prosecutor Jang said: “In particular, it is clear that he received virtual mistrust from members of the National Prosecutor’s Office who expected genuine judicial reform through the illegal or unjust exclusion of duties and disciplinary actions against the attorney general, and it will never fulfill its duty to reform the royal prosecution service. It has become. ”
In the end, “Please don’t think about taking the current president into a accompanying resignation with a daunting operation,” he said. “If you take the current president to a complementary resignation because you feel that you are not on my side while investigating against the regime.” He said, “It’s drawing people in and shaming the real prosecution reform.” He added: “When I publish this post during the service evaluation period, the Ministry of Justice notices more.”
Secretary,
Since the Minister no longer has the qualifications and ability to promote genuine judicial reform for the following reasons, please do not distort or mislead the meaning of genuine judicial reform against the people and resign from the ministerial office for genuine judicial reform.
1. As supreme head of the Ministry of Justice, despite the obligation to inform the population of the true meaning of the reform of the prosecution for an authentic reform of the prosecution,
To prevent the prosecution from playing a subordinate role under the democratic control of previous regimes and to capture the long-awaited realization of the taxation of political neutrality and political independence, the real meaning of the prosecution reform, in fact, only to cover the investigation against the regime and put democratic control to take over the prosecution. By promoting prosecutorial reform, they abused their authority by misleading the public as if it were genuine prosecutorial reform.
2. As the highest head of the Ministry of Justice, despite the obligation to respect the rule of law more than anyone else and to take the initiative in reforming the prosecution by carefully examining the intentions of the appointing authority,
The procedure to investigate the living power ordered by the appointing authority against the attorney general who is trusted by the attorney general who knows the true meaning of the tax reform more than anyone else and who is guaranteed a term of two years for the political neutrality of the prosecution. Ignoring legal review and hastily reviewing the prosecution regulations, advocating for illegal and unfair exclusion from duties and disciplinary action against the attorney general, ignoring the rule of law by ignoring the rule of law. Authority abuse
3. As President of the Supreme Court of the Ministry of Justice, despite the obligation to promptly complete the maintenance of the prosecution system in accordance with the new criminal justice system, to be implemented in one month, in cooperation with the Prosecutor General,
Such urgent and urgent tasks were carried out in the background and only because the investigation was unfavorable for the interior and the regime, for which the attorney general was subjected to the illegal and unjust exclusion of duties and disciplinary demands to prevent the complete work of the urgent criminal justice system as attorney general. Abuse of his authority by obstructing and neglecting the urgent work of completion of the criminal justice system as head of the Ministry of Justice
4. As supreme head of the Ministry of Justice, although he is obliged to listen to the advice of prosecutors more than anyone else and to inform the public of the veracity of the advice,
With only a dispassionate and authoritarian appearance, the prosecutors did not know the true meaning of the advice of the prosecution to achieve true tax reform, and with closed ears and hearts, they were deceived by the opposition of the tax reform against the people. because they only went against the interests of the minister. It is treated worse than a handwritten letter from a serious criminal and has abused its authority by misrepresenting the sincerity of members of the prosecution and distorting them.
5. Despite having to defend political neutrality as President of the Supreme Court of the Ministry of Justice,
Through social networks, etc., by failing to expose duties or demand disciplinary action against the prosecutor in charge of pro-government prosecutors and prosecutors accused of self-righteous aggression by taking an accusation measure for clearly violating the obligations of political neutrality. Abuse of authority by neglecting or tolerating rape, resulting in more encouraging results.
6. Despite being the supreme head of the Ministry of Justice, he must obey his obligations of political neutrality more than anyone else.
As a professional politician who served as representative of the ruling party and deputy of the fifth line of parliament on the side of the ruling party, he exercises excellent political sense and overwrites all kinds of political interpretations about the general performance of the attorney general, so that he investigates without warning every time without political sense and is persecuted by any regime. Despite taking the initiative to rise to the top of the presidential candidate’s approval rating, he overruled the blame on the attorney general and abused his authority by misleading the public by violating obligations of political neutrality while engaging in politics.
7. As the head of the Ministry of Justice, to make the rule of law a reality with the people, he must exercise his authority and perform duties based on the rule of law,
To pursue the interests of my side and the regime, by exercising powers like the minister’s staff and supervisory rights based on whether or not I am on my own side, the country became illegal and abused.
Even with the contents listed above by front-line prosecutors that are insufficient in many ways, the minister no longer has the qualifications and capacity to promote genuine judicial reform, and the tax reform that the minister dreams of is, in fact , further through personnel rights and supervisory rights granted to the minister. It turned out that he was trying more blatantly to make the prosecution more subservient to the regime,
This clearly goes against the reform of the royal prosecution that the people have long sought to break away from the role of the regime’s subordinates through political neutrality and the independence of the prosecution.
However, he misrepresented the public about the true meaning of the prosecution reform and, in particular, received virtual mistrust from members of the National Office Prosecutor’s Office who wanted genuine prosecutorial reform through illegal exclusion or unfair duties and disciplinary claims against the attorney general. It has become apparent that he will never be able to fulfill his duty to reform the royal prosecution.
Therefore, since the Minister no longer has the qualifications and capacity to promote genuine prosecutorial reform, please do not distort or distort the meaning of genuine prosecutorial reform against the people and resign from the ministerial office for the authentic reform of the prosecution that he so yearns for.
Please do not think of bringing the current president, who is carrying out the mission of prosecution reform requested by the appointed authority more thoroughly than anyone else, to an accompanying resignation through an overwhelming operation.
The current president, who wants to comply with more rigor than anyone else the functions of the tax reform requested by the appointing authority, and faithfully comply with the mandate guaranteed for the independence and neutrality of the prosecutors, was led to a joint resignation on the grounds that he was not on my side after conducting an investigation against the regime. If he does so, it is to lure the prosecution into politics even at the time of resignation, further insulting the genuine reform of the prosecution.
The last time I publish these posts, including the article “ The Prosecution Reform Minister Chu Dreams of, ” suggests that the meaning of the prosecution reform is highly distorted and misleading. I want to practice what I feel and I realize, although I am weak and have no strength, but I want to constantly throw stones. So I wondered if I would ever see him right away.
When I published this article during the service evaluation period, the Ministry of Justice noticed more …
Journalist Ham Min-jung [email protected]
[ad_2]
