[ad_1]
News 1
In addition, the Democratic Party will vote for two days to review the so-called ‘constitution of the non-nominated party’, the biggest obstacle to the reelection of the mayors of Seoul and Busan next April.
From 10 a.m. M. From 31 to 6 p. M. From day 1 of next month, the Democratic Party is a revised bill that adds a clue to the Party Constitution, Article 96, paragraph 2, that “ may be determined otherwise by the vote of a member of the match ”. Continue with online voting for rights party members and delegates who ask questions.
Party members who have completed admission by December 31, 2019 and who have paid the party fee 6 or more times from July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 are eligible to vote.
When the agenda for the voting of party members is approved, the Democratic Party will hold the Party Committee and Central Committee from 2-3 to finalize the review of the Party constitution and begin preparing for the contest in earnest by forming a committee to verify candidates for public office next month.
Article 96 (2) of the current Democratic Party Constitution stipulates that “ if an elected public official belonging to the party loses his position due to a serious misconduct, such as a case of corruption, and is forced to carry out a reelection or a By-election, no candidate will be recommended to the corresponding constituency. ” This is a rule made in 2015 when President Moon Jae-in was the leader of the party.
In principle, according to the Party Constitution, the Democratic Party should not nominate candidates because the mayor of Seoul and the mayor of Busan, who belong to the Democratic Party, retired due to sexual misconduct.
However, the party leadership decided that next year’s election was an important election that would be directly related to the next presidential election, and concluded that the candidate should be cast even after reviewing the party’s constitution.
As the party constitution amendment and nomination votes are expected to overwhelm the vote of party members, the nomination of Democratic Party candidates should be regarded as a fixed event. Some point out if the vote of the party members will become ‘brothers’ to resolve the political controversy.
Although it borrowed the form of the party members ‘vote, it became inevitable that, as much as it asked for the views of loyal members, the criticism that the party members’ vote was used to ensure legitimacy and justification later to reach a conclusion.
Previously, the Democratic Party used an circumvention of voting for all parties in the process of creating a “proportional satellite party” during the 4 · 15 general elections. In March, a party member’s vote of about 790,000 members of the rights party at the time asked: ‘What do you think about participating in the proportional coalition party from the Democratic Progressive Reform camp?’ 74.1% of those surveyed voted overwhelmingly in favor. done.
[ad_2]
