[ad_1]
<저작권자 ⓒ 1980-2020 ㈜연합뉴스. 무단 전재 재배포 금지.>
Chun Hyun-hee, chairman of the Civil Rights Commission, recently expressed a position on some claims that the Korean Rights Commission made a political decision regarding the suspicion of preferential military service to the son of Justice Minister Chu Mi- ae.
The former president told Facebook on the 20th: “As the president of a politician, I have been careful in everything so that the neutrality of the committee of rights and interests is not suspected.” The Kwonik Committee recently said, “I am not a public service informant” in response to a request for protection of a public interest informant by a whistleblower who raised the suspicion of Minister Chu’s son. Furthermore, he said, “We are not in conflict” regarding the role of Minister Chu and whether there is a conflict of interest in the case of the son. For this reason, some interpreted the KFTC as impeaching.
Regarding this, Chairman Jeon said, “I have never disclosed my personal opinion on the conclusion of Minister Chu Mi-ae’s authoritative interpretation of conflict of interest.
At the same time, “In order to block the controversy over neutrality, ensure fairness in the interpretation of votes and avoid misunderstandings that it is possible to give guidelines, the idea of a single president on whether it is a conflict of interest , publicly or privately, it has never been expressed internally or externally. Said.
He continued: “I emphasized the stricter and stricter job performance of the KFTC members. As president, I respect the conclusions of the KFTC’s authorized interpretation system. Furthermore, the ultimate responsibility rests with me as president.”
President Jeon said, “There are some media reports and concerns about whether the KFTC was aware of the president or the authority and interpreted the political authority according to the will.” “I can understand the concern, but the rights and interests of Korea in 2020 Above, it is neither possible nor possible.”
He said: “I emphasize it once again, but the conclusion of this interpretation of the vote is entirely the result of the strict system of interpretation of the voter.” .
He added: “The fact that the president is a politician, making a conclusion based on the presumption that the KFTC made a political decision is no different from breaking the precept of the KFTC, which is working properly on a legal basis through a fair procedure “.
