[ad_1]
The titular judge commented on his sexual orientation and wrote a column in the legal newspaper evaluating the appearance of minors in the juvenile court.
On the 14th, Suwon District Law Judge Kim Tae-gyun wrote a column titled “Fetish” in the “At Law School” column, which he writes every two weeks in the legal newspaper. In the introduction, Judge Kim said, “My eyes are classic” and said, “I still feel excited just thinking about it,” after referring to the white face that looks like a lung disease with long straight hair, red lips and small and a delicate body.
Judge Kim went on to describe the young woman’s appearance and appearance, saying, “When I try to judge a child, I meet many young friends both in and out of the courtroom.” Judge Kim said: “They are all pretty and nice, but the style is annoying. Ripped hair like Hosup has grown to the point where hair itches in the eyes. The shortened school uniform is not in bad taste. Dark makeup and colored hair erase the vibrancy of that age, ”he said. ‘Long straight hair without dyeing or perming is beautiful. It looks great to cool your hair or cut it short. Don’t wear shorts and skirts. ‘
Judge Kim said in the following passage: “I suddenly realized something. Those friends don’t exist to look pretty in my eyes ”. After she said, “No matter how much a judge judges you, you can’t say anything about it.” “I finally knew that my long straight hair and white face were just my fetish.” did. The column read: “Judgment covers right and wrong, but it is not a place to enforce the good. The same applies to both the trial of minors and the trial of cleanliness. Forced kindness is nothing more than a competitor’s hidden fetish. “
After the column was published this morning, it received harsh criticism. It is pointed out that the fact that the judge in charge of the juvenile trial mentions his preference for feminine appearance and evaluates or comments on the appearance of adolescent girls in the same vein is in itself problematic.
On the 15th, a notice board on the legal newspaper’s website read: “I find it inappropriate that the juvenile court judge is evaluating the appearance of the minors who are being tried,” he said. “It is especially shocking that I started writing with the judge’s ‘female eyes’. Are you looking at minors who are being tried by boys with the usual female eyes? Regardless of what Judge Tae-gyun Kim may have realized, the way you put it seems inappropriate. ”The comment received most of the recommendations.
“The Witch,” an activist against sexual violence and trial oversight, also said on Twitter: “Judge Lee is in charge of the ‘children’s trial.’ Seeing this article that says they evaluated their appearance while looking at the teenagers and confessed their ‘fetish’, reminds me of the victims who asked what kind of clothes they should wear to be recognized as ‘victims’ at trial. “
The Korean Women’s Lawyers Association also released a statement that day and expressed its regret to Judge Kim and the legal newspaper who contributed to the column.
The women’s lawyers association started a column with an article revealing the way ‘women’ are viewed, and it might be enough of a problem, even if the subject was not a minor, to infer that the judge is objectifying sexually in the judge’s seat. “There is a part” and he said: “We express our regret that the titular judge in charge of the juvenile trial wrote a column written with inappropriate content, and we ask that you be more cautious as a judge. Also, I would like to express my regret to the legal newspaper, which published the column of names that could be problematic without any addition or subtraction ”.
The column was republished at 4:40 pm on the 15th with the title changed from “Fetish” to “Fetish.”
The Editorial Office of the Legal Newspaper has not disclosed its position so far on the question of how the column was reported and whether to take action.
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
