[ad_1]
Possibility not to rescind due to the departure of the passport
The same agenda cannot be repeated under the National Assembly Law.
The extraordinary filibuster montage continues to the end
Difficulties in dealing with the old Law on corporate penalties for serious accidents
野 A heavy burden in preparing for the ‘Auger’ staff hearing
viewer
On the 14th, the criminal passport will vote to end the ongoing unrestricted (Filibuster) debate on the so-called “ Plant Fumigation Prohibition Law ” (Inter-Korean Relations Development Law Amendment). The day before, the pan-passport barely filled the 180 votes in favor of the rescission requirement, and put an end to obstructionism. If the vote is withdrawn on this day, there is no way to stop the obstructionism, and it is anticipated that the ruling and opposition parties will fight for the interpretation of the National Assembly Law, and the government will be more twisted.
The plenary session of the National Assembly on this day is the third obstruction of the 21st National Assembly, following the Law on Criminal Investigations of Senior Public Officials (KAI) and the Law on the National Intelligence Service. The night before, People’s Power Rep. Tae Young-ho came out as the first runner, and Democrats are also participating.
The Democratic Party has presented an agreement to end the unrestricted debate at 9:00 p.m. the previous day. Following the amendment to the National Intelligence Service Law, the Democratic Party (174 seats), the Open Democratic Party (3 seats) and an independent legislator (4 seats) will join forces to end the obstructionism of the war ban against North Korea. On that day, the leader of the Democratic Party, Kim Tae-nyeon, said at the party’s Supreme Council meeting held in the National Assembly: “In the National Assembly, there is an unlimited debate on the ‘Law of Elimination of the Korean War del Norte ‘, and obstructionism is the sixth day. The opposition party has already expressed enough intentions ”.
According to the Law of the National Assembly, the final vote is expected to end at 9 pm on this day, 24 hours after the submission of the termination request (more than 1/3 of the registered members). According to the National Assembly Law, obstructionism will end if approved by three-fifths (180 seats or more). The National Assembly forcibly ended the filibuster on the amendment to the National Intelligence Service Law the day before with the approval of 180 congressmen.
viewer
The problem is when the votes deviate. Voting on the end of obstructionism will take place anonymously. The previous day’s pan-passport was 180 votes, with one that walked away, barely meeting the completion requirements. If an additional vote comes out on this day, the end of the filibuster will be canceled.
When the closing vote on filibuster is rejected, things get complicated. This is because article 92 of the Law of the National Assembly (absence of a single issue) stipulates that “no matter rejected may not be proposed or presented again during the same session.” An official from the Ministry of State and Company said: “It seems to be something that should be discussed at the level of the National Assembly after seeing the results of the closing vote, depending on the interpretation of the law of the National Assembly, if possible or not reapply for a request for cessation of obstructionism. ”
If it is interpreted that it is impossible to resubmit the request for cessation of obstructionism that was rejected by vote under the Law of the National Assembly, it becomes difficult for both parties. The power of the people must complete the obstructionism itself. Otherwise, the obstructionism must continue until the 30th, the last day of the extraordinary meeting. In this case, as lawmakers proceed with obstructionism, they face the burden of preparing a personal audience for candidate Byeon Chang-heum from the Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Transportation.
The ruling party is also a burden. If the obstructionism continues until the end of the extraordinary National Assembly at the end of the year, the plenary session cannot handle the bills promoted by the party, such as the Law of Corporate Punishment for Severe Accidents. In addition, the responsibility of the ruling party can be raised in the situation in which the National Assembly is paralyzed due to long-term obstructionism.
/ Reporter Kyu Gyu-Oh Koo [email protected]
< 저작권자 ⓒ 서울경제, 무단 전재 및 재배포 금지 >
