[ad_1]
On the morning of the 19, the Grand Prosecutor’s Office of the Grand Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul, was arrested in connection with the suspicion of former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook. Reporter Lee Han-ho
On the 19th a meeting was held between the Chief of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office and the National High Prosecutor’s Office on the 19th to reconsider the ‘resolution of the charges’ on the charges of former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook. Two days have passed since the Minister of Justice, Park Beom-gye, commanded the investigation, saying: “At the meeting of the Vice President of the Great Swordsman, we will reconsider the possibility of prosecution and ask for the impartiality of the case and the appropriateness of the conclusions.” . The final conclusion goes to Attorney General Nam-gwan Cho, who accepted the content of Minister Park’s command once, but took advantage of the trick to “ get even with the great swordsman ”, taking into account the suspicion of the vice presidency of the great swordsman.
In the morning, only the logs are reviewed … In the afternoon, Im Eun-jung’s briefing
The meeting that started at 10 a.m. on the day at the Daeseon-gu Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul, was attended by 14 people, including 7 chiefs of the great swordsman (fiscal level) and 6 senior swordsmen nationwide. It is reported that in the morning, without discussions or opinions, he devoted himself fully to reviewing the records related to the incident. A prosecution official said: “As it is physically impossible to see all the records of more than 6,000 pages, a summary of the nucleus would have been distributed. It would have been difficult for him to become familiar with it.”
For “security”, lunch was resolved with a lunch box inside Daeseon’s office. However, it is reported that the acting chairman Cho, the chairman of the meeting, ate separately in a separate space from the participants. He seems to have taken into account the fact that having conversations about the meeting topic over lunch can have an effect even before deliberation begins in earnest.
Around 1:30 p.m., the person responsible for this case had a ‘direct explanation’. Prosecutor Lim Eun-jeong, who was taken to the Political Studies Office of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in September last year, went to the conference room and expressed his opinion on the background and issues of the case, insisting that, “after From a formal investigation, we must prosecute inmate Kim Mo, who is guilty of perjury. ” It is also known that the prosecutor Lim published a draft of the complaint that he had prepared. Prosecutors from the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office Han Dong-soo (opinion) and Chief Prosecutor Heo Jeong-soo, who was appointed by Acting General Cho as Chief Prosecutor, also attended and provided additional explanations. This procedure alone was found to take a long time.
On the morning of the 19th, when the meeting of the chief prosecutors meeting related to the suspicion of former Prime Minister Han Myung-sook took place, six senior prosecutors from all over the country entered Daeseon’s office in Seocho- gu, Seoul. From left to right, Gangnam-il Daejeon High School, Park Seong-jin Busan High School, Cho Sang-cheol Seoul High School, Jang Young-soo Daegu High School, Gu Bonseon Gwangju High School, Oh In-seo Suwon High School. Reporter Lee Han-ho
Deliberation begins in the late afternoon … focus on false testimony
The deliberation and discussion between the chief swordsman and the main swordsman began only in the late afternoon. The topic of discussion was, as Minister Park Bum-gye pointed out, △ whether the content of the inmate’s testimony was false, △ whether perjury was suspected, △ whether the purpose of the harm was recognized, etc. When the late Han Man-ho, former donor Han Man-ho, reversed the statement in the 2010-2011 trial on the case of Prime Minister Han Myung-sook’s “ illegal political funding of 900 million won ” , the essence of this suspicion is that he has asked you to testify that you once said, “I gave money to the former prime minister.”
The meeting participants are reported to have focused on examining whether there were sufficient grounds to consider inmate Kim’s testimony false. At the time, it is also an important question whether Kim intended to inflict harm on the former prime minister or the former representative of Korea. However, if “perjury” is not established, there is no need to question whether the intent is to harm. Ultimately, the biggest problem was the question of judging whether Kim’s court statements were false “contrary to memory.” Furthermore, whether there were grounds for disclosure by other inmates that “there was a conviction or coercion by the prosecutor’s investigation team” was the subject of a focal discussion by the participants.
Debate after the evening … possibility of concluding by vote
The meeting was held as a marathon meeting for more than 10 hours after dinner. Most of the attendees shook hands with the original conclusion of the great swordsman, the “ termination of the accusations ”, but some refuted that “ we need to seek judicial sentence by prosecuting once ”, and it is known that there was a heated debate . According to the Supreme Swordsman Preliminary Rules for the Supreme Swordsman Meeting, the conclusion of the meeting is unanimous in principle, but when opinions are not in agreement, the decision is made with a majority of attendance.
It is an observation inside and outside the prosecution that there is a high possibility of falling out of the vote, acting as chairman of the meeting, acting as chairman of the meeting, and the attorney general, Dong-soo Han, who is the party. Therefore, the conclusion of the meeting is expected to be decided by a total of 12 votes. In view of the fact that at least half of the six senior prosecutors on the front line have faithfully represented the internal views of the prosecution on important issues, remarks that it will “uphold the end of indictments” predominate. With this in mind, Acting President Cho will make a final decision and report it to the Ministry of Justice.
No problem reporter [email protected]
News directly edited by Hankook Ilbo can also be viewed on Naver.
Issues that may interest you
[ad_2]
