[ad_1]
Check-in 2020.09.02 16:50
영어 로 ‘People’s Power Party (PPP)’
National Standing Committee and National Committee Approved Despite Identity Controversy
Kim Jong-in “A great pillar to regain the confidence and ability of the public”
“Starting as a political party that breathes with the people”
“I got it. From now on, it’s ‘the power of the people.’
This is a message sent to journalists after receiving a new party name registration card from the Central Election Commission around 4 pm on the 2nd from the spokesperson for the Mirae Integration Party, Bae Jun-young. The Unification Party held the 3rd National Committee this afternoon and decided on a new party name, “Popular Power” and a proposal for amendments to politics and politics. After that, it was used as the official name of the party after obtaining permission from the NEC. The party sign was changed on 198, 99 days after the Unification Party (February 17), which was launched before the general election, and 99 days after the inauguration of the ‘No Captain Kim Jong-in System’ ( may 27th).
The revision of the party name was a procedure that was announced in a media interview in April, before Kim Jong-in took office, saying: “If the product is bad, you have no choice but to change the brand.” . In June, former legislator Kim Soo-min was appointed head of the party’s public relations headquarters to begin the full-blown party name review process, and a public call for party names was held on the 13th. and 21 of last month.
Of the total of 16,941 public offerings, the keyword “ national ” was the highest, with 3,300 cases, and it was ultimately decided as “ the power of the people ”. The name of the people’s power party is the power that comes from the people, the power that is exercised by the people and that unites the people as one. The party explains that it implies the power to gather.
As soon as the non-captain decided on the name of the new party on the 31st of last month, the identity controversy arose in politics. It was argued that the unified party could not change it to the same name because a party called “the power of the people” already exists.
Also, Democratic Party congressman Chung Cheong-rae said, “The ‘Power of the People’ is the group in which I was the first co-representative. The life policy network ‘Power of the People’ is the name of a civic organization that we launched in 2003 for me and many members. ” Don’t do it. ”On social media, a link also appeared to the home page of a party called ‘The Power of the People’.
Although there was such controversy, the amendment to the party name was decided on the 1st by the National Standing Committee and the National Committee on the same day. More than 80% of the permanent national members (46 in total) agreed and 90% of the 578 national members agreed.
In a morning radio interview in the morning, Ho-young Joo said: “Until now, there has been a tendency to adopt many names of parties that have values such as freedom, democracy and integration, but these days, they say they choose a lot of neutral party names. ” Isn’t that the value of the constitution? The central concept of the constitution is the people, and it repeatedly clarifies that the people are the owner, so I think the use of the word people in the name of the party fits that purpose. “
President Kim Jong-in also said in a National Committee greeting on the day: “Political politics and the revision of the party name will be built as a great pillar to regain the confidence of the people and the party’s ability to dominate.” “We will transform our constitution into a political party that leads the unification of the people.”
Along with the amendment to the party name, the new policy and policy, ‘Everyone’s promise for tomorrow’ (Junggang), and the basic policy, which is the tenth promise, was also approved by the National Committee. The basic policy was the first to claim that people can lead a stable life through basic income. It included the realization of economic democratization and the stability of people’s housing, and it also included a promise to prepare for the pandemic of a new kind of work and create quality jobs.
However, the provisions contained in the draft and the consolidation plan of the Basic Assembly and the Metropolitan Assembly were excluded from the final draft after discussions with the Hypertrophy Committee the day before.