[ad_1]
Furthermore, members of the Legislative Judiciary Committee of the Democratic Party National Assembly claimed that Yoon Seok-yeol’s “chalky asset management situation” had been deliberately and poorly investigated, and urged President Yoon to take responsibility.
Members of the democratic judiciary held a press conference in the Seoul Yeouido National Assembly Communication Hall on the 14th. Representatives Park Bum-gye, Kim Yong-min, Kim Nam-guk, Song Ki-heon, Park Ju-min and Choi Ki-sang, as well as the Secretary of the Democratic Party, Paik Hye-ryeon. Paik Hye-ryeon explained, “I stayed here to demand the responsible attitude of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol over the prosecution’s insolvency allegations and the overwhelming investigations revealed by the arrest of former Senior Prosecutor Yoon Gap-geun, Chairman of the Provincial Party. of Chungbuk “.
Earlier, Chungbuk Provincial Party Chairman Gap-geun Yoon was arrested on the 11th for pressuring Woori Bank after receiving 200 million won from Lime so that many victims could sell Lime Asset Management fund products again in the bank. This happened after Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae dismissed the investigation and was led by Yoon Chong in the case. The judiciary of the Democratic Party stipulated that “The arrest of the Chairman of the Chungbuk Provincial Party, Gap-geun Yoon, a former specialty prosecutor who has held important positions such as anti-corruption chief of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office and the deputy chief of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of the Seoul Central District showed the face of the prosecution.
The Democratic Party judges noted that President Yoon’s arrest came only after Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae exercised the authority to lead the investigation and dismissed President Yoon Seok-yeol. It is argued that it proves that Yun did not investigate properly. They said in a statement: “President Yoon was sent directly from Sam-Hyun Song (former Seoul South District Prosecutor’s Office) in May during the state administration, bypassing the general reporting system such as anti-corruption. In particular, he denied the suspicion of a “crushing investigation”, saying that Gap-geun Yoon’s case was followed by a wide range of communications accounts, except for one important reference person fleeing abroad. Even though the lobby was informed to the prosecution through a letter from the prison, he said that the investigation did not proceed and contradicted Yoon’s full investigation order. “
“The investigation team, which was not under the direction of the president, conducted a large-scale seizure and search of Woori Bank and Gap-geun Yoon’s office. On December 11, Gap-geun Yoon was arrested. “There was no tangible result during the five months that President Yoon’s command was carried out, but after the justice minister decided to exclude the president’s investigation, the ‘door to the truth’ was opened.” In addition, an arrest warrant was issued due to the situation that no investigation was carried out as an important reference during the flight abroad mentioned by President Yoon. This makes it possible to reasonably suspect that an insolvency investigation and a crushing investigation were carried out under the direction of the president. “
Furthermore, “The indictment of the ‘drunk hospitality prosecutor’ and the arrest of former senior prosecutor Gap-geun Yoon demonstrate the insolvency of the initial investigation. It’s hard to trust President Yoon’s statements that he ordered a thorough investigation. For security reasons, I highly suspect it was to squash the incident, “he urged.” If the organizational concealment was done by the command line at that time, we must take legal responsibility. “In addition, he said,” The reason why the prosecution rate for general criminal cases is in the range of 30% on average and the prosecution rate related to prosecution charges is in the range of 0.1%, “he said.” I demand a responsible attitude and a response from Yun to the alleged opposition politician and former Chief Prosecutor. “
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
