[ad_1]
Furthermore, when the Democratic Party decided to vote for a candidate for re-election to the mayor of Seoul-Busan in April next year through a vote of the old party, the force of the people fiercely rebelled and asked, “Do you even suffer from hypnosis? group? “
In a comment on the 2nd, Jun-young Bae, spokesman for the people’s power, said: “The securities party has publicly certified the end of Juanmuchi.” “Is it 87%, is it even group hypnosis?”
“There is something missing in the context of this procedure,” he said. “The Democratic Party program should also be reviewed, but we didn’t. It was noted that the ‘gender equality, the socially disadvantaged and minorities’ in paragraph 11 should be fully addressed, or at least the provisions on ‘strengthening the responsibility of the State for the prevention and eradication of sexual crimes’ should be removed. ”.
“The code of ethics also had to keep up. “Article 14 (prohibition of sexual harassment, sexual violence, etc.)” had to be deleted. Furthermore, the term “affected complainant” still exists in that clause. “I still can’t raise my head.” Spokesman Bae said: “The suspicion of sexual violence by the mayor of Seoul and Busan from the Democratic Party is the first offense. The partisans’ attack on the victims was a “second offense” and they said: “All the Democrats stepped forward and overturned the party constitution, handed over candidates and made a” third offense “to the victims. Now, if the voters vote for these Democratic Party candidates, it will be the ‘fourth round.’ “He also urged President Moon Jae-in to express his position. Spokesman Bae emphasized:” Is the Democratic Party representative, Lee Nak-yeon, seriously ‘revoking the will of President Moon? “And he emphasized that” President Moon should express his regret unless he passes a series of measures to revoke the so-called’ Moon Jae-in clause.
Kim Jong-in, chairman of the People’s Power Emergency Countermeasures Committee, also met with journalists behind the Supreme Council held in the National Assembly this morning and said: “It is a situation predicted in advance because it is a choice between them. Not everyone would be convinced, “he criticized, saying,” The Democratic Party has lost its honesty. “
Seong Il-jong also said at the meeting, “President Moon Jae-in asks you to clarify your position on next year’s by-elections for sexual offenses.” “Are there citizens who do not know that if a party member votes, it will be approved? What was the purpose of creating the no-nomination rule, which was a symbol of the president’s innovation? It shows the true nature of the Jo Byeon-seokgae (朝 變 夕 改) party. “
On that day, the Democratic Party announced that it had confirmed the nomination decision with an 87% approval rate as a result of a vote by former party members who asked whether to nominate candidates for re-election next year by reviewing the party’s constitution from the 31 of last month until 1.
Article 96 (2) of the Democratic Party Constitution stipulates that “if an elected public official belonging to the party loses his position due to a serious mistake such as corruption, the candidates are not recommended to the corresponding constituency.”
This article was created by the Party’s Innovation Committee in 2015, when President Moon Jae-in was the representative of the New Democratic Politics Association (the predecessor of the Democratic Party). Democrats cannot make a candidate.
As the result of the vote was overwhelmingly in favor, the Democratic Party plans to nominate candidates by putting an exception clause in the regulations of the relevant party’s constitution that “ may be determined differently by a vote of the whole party. ”
Kim Jin-ha, Reporter for Donga.com [email protected]
Copyright by dongA.com All rights reserved.