/cloudfront-ap-northeast-1.images.arcpublishing.com/chosun/SZEKP3GJ3VH53D6JWSARR6N4F4.jpg)
[ad_1]
Regarding the suspicion that Attorney General Choo Mi-ae’s son ‘did not return to military leave,’ his son’s lawyers made a statement on the 8th and said: “Minister Chu’s son, a KATUSA soldier , follow USFK regulations, not the ROK Army. It was extended twice in a row, and the fact that there were no documents related to the license left in the military unit was normal procedure, and there was no problem ”. I continue. “Within the Ministry of Defense, it is known that” we regret that the defense lawyers of the Minister of Justice, who are lawyers, distorted the facts without adequately capturing the facts related to the military. “
The defense team for Minister Chu’s son said in the entry statement that the military unit did not contain any documents related to his son’s vacation, that the medical certificate from the hospital was sent by email after he took sick leave first. and that he did not return to the unit after the first vacation. He stressed that the continuous extension of the third vacation was a normal procedure. In the sense that “the press is confusing the KATUSA soldiers subject to the regulations of the Army and the United States Army in Korea,” he emphasized that all the current accusations are not true.
The lawyers said: “According to the regulations of the United States Army in Korea, the license documents are kept for one year, so it is not a violation of the regulations for the absence of documents related to the license of the son of Choo “. It is reported that she needs to obtain permission again after returning, but there is no such content in the US Army regulations in Korea to apply first, and it is not known where such regulations are to be found in the Army regulations. “
The Defense Ministry said: “KATUSA soldiers are also subject to the vacation rules of the ROK Army.” Actually, ‘4-4 of the’ Korean Army Regulation 600-2 ‘. If you look at the provisions for “holidays, departures and holidays”, the first thing is “holidays”. The leave policy and procedures for ROKA personnel serving in the U.S. Army are the responsibility of the ROKA Army Chief of Staff and administered by the ROKA Support Group Commander. ROKA ”. Minister Choo’s defense team painted the areas they wanted to emphasize in the US Army regulations and distributed them to the media, but the original articles were not painted with a marker pen.
It is said that it is common sense within the Ministry of Defense that KATUSA soldiers are subject to Army regulations, as well as these regulations. A military officer said: “For KATUSA soldiers, the Housing Regulations of Barracks 120 of the Army Regulations apply.” The attorneys appear to have misunderstood the KATUSA Soldier’s stay and vacation rules, but the US Army rule in Korea says nothing about extending vacations without returning to the unit. “
The defense team of Minister Chu’s son also insisted: “Because KATUSA soldiers are subject to the Army regulations in Korea that require the storage of license data for only one year, it does not violate the Army regulations that require storage for five years. ” It is not a charge. Currently, it is known that the unit has no data on the vacation of Minister Chu’s son in 2016.
It is reported that the Ministry of National Defense submitted a written interpretation of the votes containing the provisions and content that KATUSA Soldier’s data storage is 5 years in the Congressional People’s Power Office, Han-Hong Yoon. According to Minister Chu’s clarification, even if it is correct to keep KATUSA soldiers’ vacation data for only one year, the 2018 vacation records of KATUSA soldiers other than Minister Chu’s son have been more than a year, and the question arises why they are still preserved.
The legal community responded that “the staff appear to be twisted, while the lawyers for Minister Chu’s son interpreted the complex regulations related to the military as a subjunctive argument and tried to clarify it quickly.”
