Eon-Joo Lee “Crime of the Korea-Japan underwater tunnel, a pro-Japanese framework that could appear in the words that were saved”

Controversy continues over the ‘Korean-Japanese Submarine Tunnel Construction Review’ announced by Kim Jong-in, Chairman of the National People’s Power. Also, as criticism emerged from the Democratic Party and others, preliminary candidate Lee Eon-ju, who promised to do so, began to rebut and refute. The preliminary candidate said: “The ruling party is causing an absurd political upheaval.”

“Is it Japanese? Pro-Japanese DNA?” Lee Eon-ju, who is criticized

Candidate Lee said on his Facebook page on the night of Day 1: “About the Korean-Japanese submarine tunnel, where President Kim Jong-in responded to a proposal that would be an opportunity for Korea and Busan’s economy to give a leap forward, “The blame is coming out,” he wrote. Candidate Lee dismissed: “What the Democrats are demanding is simply to confine Busan, which will be the central Asia-Pacific city, inland and push it into a dead end in the southeast side of the Korean peninsula. “

At the same time, he argued, “I am putting a pro-Japanese framework that would appear in the days of the old Korean words.” This preliminary candidate is, “Have you ever adequately solved the problem of living eating and living with the Democratic Party?”, “Isn’t that Busan wanted Busan to absorb human and physical capital as a logistical base because they yelled that they had to run the new Gaduk airport? ”he asked.

He said, “Why are you opposed to the Korea-Japan Submarine Tunnel, which will bring the logistics demand in southern Japan to the New Gaduk Airport?”

Earlier, Kim Jong-in, chairman of the People’s Power Emergency Response Committee, held a non-commissioned meeting on the spot in Busan on this day and announced the position of actively reviewing the Hanil Underwater Tunnel with the support of the New Airport. of Gadeok. Lee Nak-yeon, head of the Democratic Party, visited Busan last month and promised to deal with the New Gaduk Airport Special Law in February.

President Kim emphasized economic effects such as “Production of 54.55 trillion won, employment incentive effect of 450,000”, and preliminary candidate Lee Eon-ju held a press conference afterward, saying, “Establish Busan as a global transportation and logistics complex and enhance Korea-Japan relations. “Can be used as an opportunity for the company,” expressed a welcome position.

However, negative reactions to the ‘Korea-Japan Submarine Tunnel’ came from the Democratic Party. Park In-young and the preliminary Democratic Party candidate called for withdrawal of the pledge and said: “It is a substitute for what the Japanese government wants to say.”

The preliminary candidates for Byeon Seong-wan and Kim Young-chun from the same party were also stipulated as ‘Hwangdang promise’. Preliminary candidate Byeon Seong-wan argued that “I am irresponsibly spitting out an absurd and vain promise that I cannot keep.” Preliminary candidate Kim Young-chun urged: “It is a project that has already been judged inevitable by the verification of economic viability of the MB regime,” and urged “New Gadeokdo Airport to apologize for the 10 lost years.”

“The ‘pro-Japanese DNA’ of people’s power has been revealed (Choi Taek-yong, SNS spokesperson of the Central Party)”, “A project that is more profitable for Japan than Korea (Chief In-ho, main spokesman of the Central Party ) “, continued the cold comments from the Democratic Party, such as the promise (Woo Won-sik, chairman of the Special Committee for Balanced National Development of the Democratic Party).

The progressive party also apologized. Preliminary Progressive Party candidates Roh Jung-hyun made a brief comment, saying: “President Kim, who presented a project that is only to the advantage of Japan, should bow his head to the citizens of Busan and apologize. Stop the spread. of vain development commitments “.