[ad_1]
Political bar-I want to know about Yunhyung Gil
As I watched Ambassador Lee Soo-hyuk’s comments, ‘Should we elect America in the next 70 years?’
Ambassador Lee Soo-hyuk responds to a question from a member of Congress during a state affairs audit of the US embassy in the Foreign Affairs Committee held in the National Assembly on the 12th. On this day, the audit of affairs statements of the United States embassy was carried out by videoconference as part of the COVID-19 quarantine measures. Yunhap news
“Rather, let’s say, ‘Korea should choose China, not the United States.'” () “Lee Soo-hyuk, who has eaten away the trust of the alliance, is he qualified as an ambassador to the United States?” Lower level ‘Code Ambassador’ ()
Looking at the offensive that the conservative media launched on the 14th on the statements of South Korean Ambassador Lee Soo-hyuk on the alliance between the ROK and the United States, I once again realize that this issue is a political failure that separates the left and the right of Korean society. Ambassador Lee said in a state audit at the Korean Embassy to the United States on the 12th: “Because we elected the United States 70 years ago, we do not have to elect the United States for the next 70 years. In the future, we must be able to love America and the (ROK-US alliance) must become our national interests to elect America. Only then will the alliance between the ROK and the USA be strong. “In fact, this observation is not a problem as a” general theory “that explains the reality of international politics that operates on the basis of the cold judgments of the sovereign countries over national interests. As Ambassador Lee said in a videoconference at the George Washington University Institute for Korean Studies on 3 last month, it is unmistakable that “the economy is leaning on China by the United States that Korea does not see “As important as security.” Japanese Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga, who addresses both the alliance with the United States and ours, also said: “Strategically, the“ Asian version of NATO ”(quad) to exclude China from the LDP debate on the 12th. It’s not okay. “However, as opposition lawmakers such as Park Jin-Seok and Jeong Jin-seok pointed out, it is questionable whether the Korean ambassador to the United States would repeat statements that we can choose between the United States and China (such as an alliance) During the Korean War, up to 33,743 young Americans were killed in the battle.Since then, in the postwar international order led by the United States, Korea has achieved a miracle of success in both democratization and industrialization. Korea’s success, in which they shed their blood, has since become “the pride of America.” Maintaining an alliance has a cost that cannot be said. To ensure the participation of States In the United States, South Korea expelled the farmers of Daechu-ri and Doduri in Pyeongtaek and provided the largest overseas military base currently owned by the United States. There is no end to listing the costs we have paid from the gruesome ‘Yun Geum-i incident’ to the recent ‘Thad controversy’. By contrast, the United States has 45,000 American soldiers and their families on this base to demonstrate their defense commitments. In an emergency, your fate will drive the US decision, including “anti-expansion” (nuclear umbrella). When national interests change and love ceases, the alliance is destined to end. But it’s not really breaking up, so you need to say, “Love is changing anyway.” The wise silence sometimes cracks. By Gil Yoon-hyung, Staff Reporter [email protected]
[ad_2]
