[ad_1]
According to the 2017 report “Comfort Women Agreement TF”,
Inspector Moon Jae-in after the government launch
“I do not mention final and irreversible resolutions”
Jung, Yeon-Yeon “I know from the billion yen press
On December 28, 2015, after talks on the issue of comfort women at the Seoul Foreign Office, Foreign Minister Yoon Byung-se (right) and the Japanese Foreign Minister, Fushio Kishida, held a joint press conference. Hankyoreh reporter Kim Bong-kyu
Along with the controversy over whether Yoon Min-hyang and the elected representative of the Republic of Korea Citizens Party knew about the content of the 2015 Japanese-Japanese “comfort women” agreement, reports investigating the consensus of the Comfort women after the launch of the Moon Jae-in government were attracting attention. President-elect Yoon’s name is not directly mentioned in this report, but it does contain information that can be used to guess the situation at the time. In July 2017, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs held a “ Working Group (TF) for Consensus Review on Victims of Japanese and Japanese Women in Military Comfort ” with 9 members, including civil commissioners and the Ministry Of Foreign Affairs. Sun review report released.
The report said: “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs recognized the importance of persuading victim organizations to reach a consensus.” In 2015 alone, they contacted victims and related organizations more than 15 times. Although the name of the group is not specific, it seems certain that the Foreign Ministry met with Yoon, since the representative group related to “comfort women” at that time was the Council of Korean Psychiatric Countermeasures (Jung Dae- hyup), who was represented by President-elect Yoon.
At the center of the controversy was how the government met with related groups like Jeong Dae-hyup and explained to what extent and how they communicated. “In the course of the negotiations, the Foreign Ministry explained the content of the victims from time to time,” said Tiff. “He did not give specific details about the actions that the Korean side should take, such as confirming the final and irreversible resolution and refraining from criticizing the international community.” I emphasized. The “Im irreversible” provision that caused public outrage was that the victims were not informed. At the press conference on the 11th, the succession of Jeong Dae-hyup, the Memory of Justice Coalition, also explained that there was a unilateral notice of the facts about the media reports at the end of the negotiations instead of consultations. with the Ministry of Foreign Relations. President-elect Yoon also claims that the Foreign Ministry announced only a small amount of content, including the Japanese government’s apologies, the day before the deal.
In a Tf report, the Japanese government’s one billion yen (about 11 billion won) grant fund said: “The amount of money did not collect the opinions of the victims.” However, it is not stated in the report whether the group of victims had previously received “1 billion yen” from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. At the press conference, Jeongui Memory Coalition said: “The content was discussed through media reports even before the announcement. “Before the official announcement, we did not receive information related to one billion yen.” President-elect Yoon also explained that a billion yen was not announced at a press conference at the time of the Korea-Japan agreement, but it was learned later and not known in advance.
By Kim So-yeon, journalist Jeong Hwan-bong, [email protected]
[ad_2]
