[ad_1]
The general situation of the murder and damage of an official, Mr. A, contained in the traditional North Korean text, which was published by the Blue House on the 25th, contradicts the arguments of the Korean army. Our armed forces said that there was an inhumane and unethical situation in the process of killing Mr. A by North Korea and burning and damaging the body. However, according to the traditional text, North Korea insisted that it was not a great mistake to follow the procedures established in the border area. President Kim Jong-un said, “I’m very sorry,” in a traditional prayer. The traditional text was worded as if there was no action that the international community could blame. In the military, criticism came out as “North Korea’s unique double game”
The analysis of the traditional text of North Korea and our army is decisively mixed in details related to the abuse and murder of North Korea against Mr. A. Our army believed that the North Korean ship had been dragging the float that Mr. A he had been carrying a rope for more than six hours, and it was only long after the first discovery. However, the North bypassed this process and explained it as if it triggered a normal warning when Mr. A crossed the Northern Limit Line (NLL) in the West Sea. North Korea continued to disobey the crackdown order and fired two ball bombs (air projectiles), creating a situation where an unidentified target could escape. It was 40-50 m “.
Although North Korea did not explain it in detail, it was interpreted as a claim that it was a general situational measure in response to the National League elections. They unilaterally claimed that their actions were in ‘self-defense’ without explaining the circumstances of the ‘interrogation at sea’ while binding Mr. A near the ship with a rope for 6 hours. Our military believed that Mr. A was treated as a corona infection agent for several hours through intelligence, and was eventually killed, which was extremely unusual. Military officials said “I didn’t know North Korea would do that.”
The arguments of the two Koreas about the damage to Mr. A’s body are markedly mixed. Our military said that the north side spilled oil and ignited the body of Mr. A, who was killed around 10 pm on the 22nd, and the fire was observed for 40 minutes. However, North Korea said: “We searched after shooting, but the intruder (Mr. A) was not present on the float and a large amount of blood was found.” Incinerated. “He said he burned a float, not a body.
Shin Jong-woo, a researcher at the Korea Defense Security Forum, said: “A person who caught a float in rough seas for more than 24 hours and slipped in front of a patrol boat tried to flee in front of a patrol boat and killed according to the regulations of the guard service. It is not common sense to understand that there is only one float left. ”“ It is not a situation where a person who is exhausted while holding a float can threaten the North Korean military, and North Korea’s argument is just a sophistry to justify and cover up the murder of our people. Said. One military officer said: “In common sense, does it make sense that it takes 40 minutes to burn a single tube?”
In this context, the authenticity of the ‘apple’ that North Korea revealed through traditional texts was also questioned. The head of the National Security Office, Seo Hoon, said in the North’s notice that there were apologies, expressions of regret and prevention of recurrence from the Korean people, but the North has not disclosed this fact in public. Instead of saying ‘apple’, Kim Jong-un said ‘sorry’. Suh stressed that the North Koreans responded promptly, but North Korea was silent for more than two days after the incident on the 22nd. The day before, when the Korean government violently condemned, it sent a traditional sentence that day.
Professor Nam Ju-hong of Gyeonggi University said: “Kim Jong-un’s apology is a re-enactment of the old North Korean-style double game.” He said, “It’s work.”
