[ad_1]
 |
|
| ▲ Additionally, Democratic Party Chairman Tae-yeon Kim and Policy Committee Chairman Han Jeong-ae speak at a policy coordination meeting held at the Yeouido National Assembly in Seoul on the morning of the 12th. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
In addition, it is reported that the Democratic Party plans to discuss in the Supreme Council on the 13th the promulgation of the ‘Law on Business Penalty for Serious Accidents’, which is emerging as a cooperation between the Justice Party and the popular power. However, according to multiple party leaders on the 12th, it is difficult to lead to the “adoption of the party argument” demanded by the world of work. It is said that the opposition of the working-level team, including internal representative Kim Tae-nyeon and Han Jeong-ae, chairman of the policy committee. A key official from Lee Nak-yeon’s side also expressed a negative stance, saying that this is “prematurely” the ‘meeting of representatives of the three parties’ related to the Law on Business Penalty for Severe Accidents proposed by the Party of the Justice.
Even within the Democratic Party leadership, there are criticisms that “it is undesirable to withdraw the Law on Business Penalty for Severe Accidents, which the party leader directly emphasized,” and “the Democratic Party is steadily backtracking on the progressive agenda with the movement to relieve 3% of the fair economy. ” Comes out.
“Recently, there is a tendency to overlook companies”
Several party leaders confirmed in the day’s conversations that “I don’t know if it will be a formal agenda in the Supreme Council tomorrow, but there will be discussions about the enactment of the Law on Business Penalty for Severe Accidents.” However, unlike the statements of the chairman of the Democratic Party, Lee Nak-yeon, “(The adoption of the argument of the party in the Law of Corporate Punishment for Severe Accidents) will not be such a difficult problem” (11), the opinion that the adoption of the party argument will be difficult.
Mr. A, an official from the Democratic Party leadership, said: “There is a situation where there are disagreements within the party on the enactment of the Law on Punishment for Businesses with Serious Disasters” and “Would you like to spend tomorrow by the process of coordination of opinions through the Supreme Council “. He said, “At first, CEO Lee Nak-yeon made a strong commitment to the corporate punishment law for severe disasters, as mentioned in a bargaining organization speech, but the internal representative is expressing a negative position.” He noted: “Recently, the Democratic Party has to raise a question about the tendency to bypass business or turn conservative.”
Earlier, in a speech by the representative of the bargaining organization in September, CEO Nak-yeon Lee said: “Every year about 2,000 workers are sacrificed in the industrial field. Such misfortunes must now be avoided.” “The legislation of the Basic Law of Life Safety and the Law of Punishment for Serious Accidents is the beginning. He had professed:” Please make an effort by the competent standing committee to do it quickly. “However, in a recent media interview, CEO Lee took a step back and said: “We can discuss the Law on Punishment for Companies with Serious Disasters in the Occupational Safety and Health Law.” In the Democratic Party and the policy committee, instead of promulgate a new Law on Punishment for Serious Accidents, the existing Occupational Health and Safety Law is revised to impose fines on managers.
Another member of the Democratic Party leadership, Mr. B, said: “At present, it seems difficult to adopt the party’s argument of the Law on Business Punishment for Major Accidents. Although the Party’s Policy Committee is exchanging further advances with the Ministry of Employment and Labor that the previous revision of the Occupational Safety and Health Law, companies with serious disasters “It is inevitable that there will be a great difference between the intensity of the punishment and the enactment of a separate punishment law,” he criticized.
Mr. C, a member of the Democratic Party leadership, said, “I can’t help but consider complaining that companies are too tough.”
“Lee Nak-yeon’s Third Party Representative Meeting? From the party’s position summary”
 |
|
| ▲ In addition, the representative of the Democratic Party, Lee Nak-yeon, is wearing glasses to review the data at the Supreme Council meeting held in the National Assembly on the morning of the 9th. | |
| Ⓒ Joint coverage photo |
See related photos |
Representative Lee Nak-yeon is also in the position that it is difficult to adopt the party argument of the Severe Accident Business Penalties Act. A key representative on the representative side said in a phone call that “the party’s position has not yet been clearly settled” and “it is not easy to decide as the party’s argument.”
The official also showed a negative position on the meeting of the Democratic Party, the power of the people and the representatives of 3 parties of the Justice Party in relation to the Law of Corporate Punishment for Severe Accidents proposed by the executive director of the Justice Party , Kim Jong-cheol, that day, saying: “The alignment within the party comes first.” He said: “Currently, the Party is receiving a joint proposal for the Serious Accident Punishment Law (Representatives Park Ju-min and Woo Won-sik). He said:“ We will meet if we can go to the review of the law (sanan law). ) or not.
The Corporate Punishment for Severe Accidents Act is a law that strengthens the responsibilities of employers by imposing criminal penalties and punitive damages on managers of companies in which serious industrial accidents, such as death, have occurred. Previously, the Justice Party discussed the severe accident corporate punishment law in June, which introduced criminal penalties such as imprisonment for at least three years and punitive damages equal to 3 to 10 times the amount of damages to companies and business owners. and related public officials in which a serious disaster occurred Initiated. Discussions in the National Assembly, which had been slow, were hastened by Kim Jong-in, chairman of the People’s Power Emergency Response Committee, who met with the Justice Party on the 10th and displayed a progressive attitude, saying : “We must cooperate as the first party” in the Law of commercial penalties for serious accidents.
The Democratic Party, which felt the pressure, even took action. The Business Severe Accident Penalty Act, announced by Democratic Party lawmakers Park Ju-min and Woo Won-shik, announced on the 11th that it provided a four-year grace period for workplaces with fewer than 50 employees, but criminals such as imprisonment for two years or more and a fine of 500 million won or more. It is similar to the Justice Party plan in that the punitive damages compensation system was eliminated at least five times the amount of punishment and damage.
The election of the democratic party in cycle 50
 |
|
| ▲ In front of the Yeouido National Assembly in Seoul on the morning of the 12th, a day before the 50th anniversary of Jeon Tae-il’s death, a sculpture urged to legislate the “Jeon Tae-il Act 3” is installed. | |
| Ⓒ Yonhap News |
See related photos |
Unfortunately, the 13th, when the Democratic Party decided to discuss the corporate punishment law for severe disasters, which has come up as a political issue, marks the 50th anniversary of Jeon Tae-il’s death.
The ‘Jeon Tae-il Law 3’, prepared by the labor community for the 50th anniversary of this year’s Jeon Tae-il, contains the corporate punishment law for severe disasters (the rest is the Labor Standards Law, the amendment to the Labor Union Law). In the world of work, the Democratic Party is raising the voice that it should adopt the Law of Commercial Sanctions for Severe Accidents as a party argument. They doubt the authenticity of the ruling party in power. In fact, Han Jeong-ae, chairman of the Democratic Party’s Policy Committee, publicly expressed a negative position on adopting the party’s argument in a meeting with journalists that day.
In the public opinion poll on the Law of Business Penalization for Severe Accidents announced on the 12th, positive public opinion was overwhelmingly high with 58.2% in favor and 27.5% against. . In September, a petition to legislate the Law on Business Penalty for Severe Accidents, which was filed by the late Kim Yong-gyun, the late mother of a young non-regular worker, Kim Mi-sook, president of the Kim Yong-gyun Foundation , approved more than 100,000 signatures.
[관련 기사]
58.2% of the population should punish companies in serious disasters’, if the Democratic Party moves http://omn.kr/1qg2a
People’s Power Party + Justice = Punishment Law for Companies with Serious Accidents? … “I made money and I made money” http://omn.kr/1qebc
The shape of the Justice Party + the pressure of the people … Nak-yeon Lee “Yes, welcome” http://omn.kr/1qegh
The Democratic Party is also receiving applause for the enactment of the Corporate Punishment for Severe Accidents Act, but the result? http://omn.kr/1qf07
The National Assembly’s petition for Kim Yong-gyun’s mother’s ‘Corporate Punishment Law for Severe Accidents’ exceeded 100,000
