[ad_1]
On the 25th, when Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol returned to office due to a suspension of disciplinary action (two months of honesty), the Korean Democratic Party showed a strong expression. Regarding the discipline received by President Yoon, he did not hide his anger towards the judiciary, which cited the stay of execution the previous day (24), and said it would further push for the reduction of the prosecution. There was no time to squeeze the anti-impeachment voice calling for a change or renewal in the leadership of the state administration.
Democratic Party Chairman Lee Nak-yeon said on Facebook “There has been growing public concern that the Republic of Korea is subject to excessive judicial scrutiny. I heard that the legalization of politics and the politicization of the judiciary have exceeded the dangerous level. “And I wrote. The Supreme Commissioner of the Democratic Party, Shin Dong-geun, a member of the legal and judicial judges of the National Assembly, said via Facebook the night before that the prosecution’s request for a stay of execution and the decision to subpoena the court called themselves the “Alliance of Privileged Groups” and he said: “Strong resistance from legal cartels to adhere to the criminal and judicial powers. In this context, it determined to promote in a systematic and energetic way an intensive reform of the prosecution and a judicial reform to systematically establish democratic control and civil control “.
On the morning of the 25th, Nak-Yeon Lee and the representative of the Democratic Party moved after an emergency meeting on the decision to suspend the disciplinary application of the court’s decision to suspend the application of the disciplinary action with the Party representative Democrat, Kim Tae-nyeon, and the chairman of the Legislative Justice Commission of the National Assembly, Yoon Ho-jung, and the court’s decision to suspend the application of disciplinary action. You are doing. At the meeting that day, it was argued that there was a violation of the separation of powers that the court issues with the disciplinary process within the administration, where the home of President Moon Jae-in was made. News 1
The reverse idea that the court overturned President Yoon Jae-in’s punishment, which was given by President Moon Jae-in, was rather a “violation of the separation of powers.” Then he got to the court. Democratic Party legislator Min Hyung-bae, former Blue House Secretary for Social Policy, posted on Facebook “A trial that demolishes the president’s house, this is a clear separation of powers”Saying “The president elected by the sovereign and the officials of the unelected state organizations that shake the state management system centered on the president.”I wrote.
At a meeting chaired by President Nak-Yeon Lee on the morning of that day, he convened and chaired members of the party’s judiciary. “The court that annuls the exercise of internal rights according to the disciplinary process of the administration itself may not only be concerned about the politicization of the judiciary, but also have a problem of separation of powers” There is, “said a participant . The conclusion of the meeting was to expand and reorganize the TF party power agency to reform the TF (President Yoon Ho-jung) prosecutor’s office in order to increase the momentum of the impeachment-related legislation with the goal of separation full investigative power and the right to prosecution.
On the afternoon of the 25th, Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who returned to work after summoning the Seoul Administrative Court’s request for a stay of enforcement of the disciplinary provision, addresses the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho- gu, Seoul. Yunhap news
However, at the party level, it was decided not to draw the front line with the court. Another participant said: “If we look at the sentence of the previous day, the court takes very seriously the reasons for the punishment of President Yoon, and in the case of the sentence against Professor Kyung-Shim Chung on the 23rd, the appearance of the personal disposition of the judge is largely reflected. I made it clear with ‘.’ Democratic Party lawmaker Kim Yong-min, who attended the meeting, wrote on Facebook that he “consistently promotes reform through the system, but must hold the wrong prosecutors (including the president) accountable for establishing justice.”
It was the atmosphere of the passport as a whole that the hostility to the prosecution and the court prevailed. President Lim Jong-seok, who declared his retirement from “institutional politics” last year, “The attitude of the prosecution and the interpretation of the court. It exudes a very unfamiliar sense of choice and a familiar smell of vested interests. “Posted a post on Facebook. It was a post after breaking a long silence after the last 4 · 15 general election. Special reporter Lim ran a post saying: “I have to find something to do so that democracy does not weaken too easily and the president does not sits alone ”, suggesting a return to the political world. On this day, the posting on the rights party bulletin board on the Democratic Party home page was “This was because the prosecution and court failed to reform in a timely manner with 180 seats.”
Democratic Party members Kim Nam-guk (left to right), Shin Dong-geun, Kim Jong-min and Kim Yong-min, who are members of the Legislative Judicial Committee of the National Assembly, are entering Lee’s office for an emergency closed meeting with Democratic Party representative Lee Nak-yeon that took place in the National Assembly Hall on the 25th. On this day, the participants agreed to push forward the reform of the prosecution system without trembling, and they decided to launch the TF prosecutorial reform within the party. Yunhap news
There were some in the party’s magnetism. One sign-up-oriented lawmaker sighed: “If you spend your energy talking about the judiciary’s judgment based on political affiliation, the only thing left is for the approval ratings of President Moon and the party to drop.” A former legislator, an unconventional party in the party, said: “It is not okay to criticize the judiciary, but I don’t know what those who support the president are doing. Even now, you have to admit the wrong part and correct it even if a limb is cut to a certain extent. ”
However, even in the mainstream within the party, there were not few voices that the sooner the better the replacement of Minister Chu Mi-ae would be. Key officials of the Democratic Party spoke with JoongAng Ilbo on this day. “Since I have already expressed my gratitude, and even this situation has occurred, there is no way that my gratitude will be canceled.”Saying “If you were disciplined, you had to take good care of it so that it could be accepted, but there are many regrets.”Said. A member of the Seoul region also said: “Minister Chu should take a clear responsibility and handle it carefully so that the president does not have a spark.” A third-line legislator in the metropolitan area “It is true that the extortion of Yoon, which began from the time of the investigation of the former Korean minister, was promoted.”Saying “The problem was the irrationality of Minister Chu. The successor minister must be a reasonable person with great confidence from the prosecutors. “Said.
Reporter Ha Jun-ho [email protected]
[ad_2]
