[ad_1]
In addition, current Democratic Party lawmakers and elected members of the 21st National Assembly responded to various suspicions surrounding President Yoon Mi-hyang and Justice Memories Solidarity (Juie Yeon Yeon) on the 14th. It is just that, the offensive.
They held a press conference in the Communication Hall of the National Assembly in the morning and insisted: “Stop separating yourself from victims based on long-standing beliefs and President-elect Yoon Mi-hyang, and do not blaspheme the lives of groups. and individuals who have dedicated themselves to solving Japanese problems of sexual slavery. ” .
This is the first time that ruling party lawmakers have made public statements since the controversy over Jeong Yeon-yeon at grandmother Lee Yong-soo’s press conference. In the statement, 16 people, including Kang Chang-il, Sang-hee Kim, In-sun Nam, Hong-ik-pyo Song, Gap-seok Song, Chun-suk Jeong, Yoon-gyeong Jeon, Dang-jeong Jung , Yang-hyang Lee, Su-jin Lee, and Oh-kyung Lim.
They said, “This is a typical method of attacking a messenger to harm a message.” Even if Jeong Eui-yeon makes a small mistake, the meaning and performance of the activity should not be denied. “Without a justice campaign for Japanese sexual slavery, it would not be possible to reveal to the world how human rights were trampled on in the war and what Japan had done.”
The controversy over accounting fraud was claimed to be “the goal of institutional improvement.” Representative Hong Ik-pyo said: “I think the controversy over whether there is transparency and corruption in the fundraising operation will be investigated fairly, and if there is a mistake, I think we can take responsibility and systematically improve it.”
Furthermore, some of the allegations that President-elect Yoon acknowledged in advance the content of the Park Geun-hye administration’s consolation agreement: “Even at the time, I was a member of the Japanese women’s comfort issue.” it made sense to report whether or not he had informed Yoon Mi-hyang, President Jeong Yeon-yeon at the time. “It is correct to distort the foreign affairs of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, which led to a wrong agreement, to talk about the past problem distorting it again. “
In comments made by the Justice Party the same day, the controversy and the issue of “comfort women” were separated. A Justice Party spokesman, Kang Min-jin, said in a written briefing earlier today: “Attempt to undermine the civil movement movement and justify the mistakes of the old government by using this issue as a tool for political crimes. ” “The question of the qualities and importance of the civil movement in solving women’s comfort and the problems of the Korea-Japan agreement at the time of the Park Geun-hye regime must be addressed as separate issues.”
By Hye-young Kim, reporter [email protected]
Empathy is possible even when you’re offline
[ad_2]
