[ad_1]
The court decided on day 1 that it would temporarily suspend the effect of the suspension of duties received by Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol. General Yoon returned to work after a week’s suspension. The supervision committee of the Ministry of Justice concluded that there was a procedural flaw in Minister Choo Mi-ae’s request for supervision and disciplinary action.
As the courts and prosecutors held President Yoon Suk-yeol’s hand, newspapers reported that Minister Choo Mi-ae was in trouble, but reported that Minister Chu appeared to have continued to apply disciplinary procedures. In a meeting with Prime Minister Chung Sye-gyun and President Moon Jae-in on Day 1, rumors of the “ shared resignation of Chu-Yun ” emerged, but when the reports are summarized, the shared resignation is denied. officially.
The newspapers noted that when Minister Choo Mi-ae finally decides to punish, President Moon will have to make a decision. Before this, there are also notable editorials that President Moon explained about the situation and urged him to make a decision. Chosun Ilbo ordered President Moon to barely apologize and apologize to Minister Chu, and Kyunghyang Shinmun to explain the situation and end the decision.
The following is the title of the main article on the front page of the main general newspapers published in the morning.
Kyunghyang Shinmun “The court and the supervisory commission ‘win Yun Seok-yeol’s decision'”
Kookmin Ilbo “I will immediately return to work ‘to uphold the constitution and the rule of law'”
Dong-A Ilbo “The court ‘the exclusion of the duties of the former president is contrary to the claim of neutrality'”
Seoul Newspaper “The Court’s Suspension of the Job Exclusion … Yun Seok-yeol Returns Immediately”
Segye Ilbo “Suk-yeol Yoon returns … Tribunal ‘The Attorney General, the Minister cannot be ignored'”
El Chosun Ilbo “Violation of the anarchy of the court’s ‘prosecutor’s neutrality’
JoongAng Ilbo “Go back to Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, ‘I will protect the constitutional spirit'”
Hankyoreh braking “Court’Job Exclusion ‘… Yoon Seok-yeol is back in 7 days”
Hankook Ilbo “Suk-yeol Yoon, returning to work in a week … ‘I will uphold the rule of law'”
The court decided on day 1 to “stop the execution of the order issued by the Minister of Justice, Chu Mi-ae.”
The Fourth Administrative Division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Director Mi-yeon Cho) partially cited a request for suspension of the exclusion of duties, filed by President Yoon against Minister Chu. The Judiciary decided to suspend the effect of the suspension of functions of President Yun until 30 days after the sentence. The reason is that “the suspension of duty provision has effectively the same effect as the dismissal” and the “exclusion of the functions of the attorney general” for conducting an investigation contrary to the intention of the government, which according to President Yoon, undermines political independence and neutrality of the prosecution. It is possible ”, quotes the logic.
The supervisory commission of the Ministry of Justice also said: “Mr. Yoon’s request for supervision and disciplinary action from the Ministry of Justice is unfair due to a procedural flaw. The Ministry of Justice announced that it would postpone Yun’s disciplinary committee, which was scheduled for the 2nd, until the 4th.
After the court ruling was issued that day, President Yoon said, “As a public official in Korea, I promise to do my best to uphold the constitutional spirit and the rule of law.” “Let us maintain political neutrality and fight to become the public prosecutor through fair and equal criminal law enforcement.”
Some newspapers found it difficult for Minister Choo Mi-ae to impose disciplinary measures, as both the courts and the decision of the oversight committee had accepted Yoon’s argument. However, he did not expect the discipline to stop.
Hankook Ilbo said in a cover story: “As the ruling by the court and the oversight committee continued, Chu became too burdensome to impose severe disciplinary measures such as firing or removing President Yoon. There are also observations that the very holding of the disciplinary committee may be removed as the fact that it was voiced is revealed ”.
The title of the first page of the Kyunghyang Shinmundo was selected as “The court and the supervisory commission ‘decision of Yun Seok-yeol”. In this article, Kyunghyang Shinmun said, “The court and the prosecution of the Ministry of Justice successively raised the hand of Mr. Yun and Minister Chu was in trouble.” Controversy over legitimacy is expected to continue even if a decision is made for the discipline of President Yoon as is.
Following the decision of the court and the supervisory commission, there is talk of whether the disciplinary action of the Ministry of Justice will be applied against President Yoon Suk-yeol or whether the resignation will be accompanied by ‘Chu Mi-ae-Yun Seok-yeol’. The Hankook Ilbo, on the front page, addressed the concomitant resignation theory, saying that “Minister Chu’s tough maneuvering is imposing a burden on the administration of state affairs” is the atmosphere at the center of the passport.
The Chosun Ilbo page 1 “Even in the court decision … By publishing an article 靑 ‘Suk-yeol Yoon’s Execution Procedure’, he predicted that even if the court and the supervisory committee decided to suspend the exclusion from work, there would be disciplinary action against President Yoon. The Hankyoreh reported that although Minister Chu, who was in trouble, is said to first request an interview with the Blue House, there was no talk of the “comrade’s resignation.”
In this article, Chosun Ilbo quoted a senior passport official as saying: “There was a problem with the court’s decision, but it has gone too far to go back.” “President Moon has to decide whether to fire Yun if the disciplinary committee decides to discipline Yoon,” he said. However, with the court’s decision, President Yoon returned to work and President Moon had to take the initiative. ” On the third page, an article was posted about why President Moon would not directly fire President Yoon Suk-yeol.
In an article on the third page of the Hankyoreh, “Minister Chu is expected to enforce the disciplinary procedure for President Yun after following the deputy minister’s greeting.” The theory of accountability is set to grow even bigger. “
“After meeting Prime Minister Jeong Sye-gyun this morning, Minister Chu, who was in trouble, visited the Blue House to interview President Moon Jae-in. The presidential interview cited a statement by a Blue House official who denied the ‘companion’s resignation theory’, saying, “It is a message from passport officials that Minister Chu first voluntarily requested to report the situation.
The Kyunghyang Shinmun also quoted a Ministry of Justice official on the cover, saying: “There was no discussion about the resignation.” In the article on page 4, “President Moon, who has remained silent and a bystander in this incident, is growing in responsibility, and if Yoon does not accept the disciplinary outcome, the situation may prolong the situation. Opinions seem difficult to ignore, “he said.” Since the conflict between Chu and Yoon is becoming a burden on the state administration, there are not many demands that President Moon end the decision in the end, “he said.
The Kyunghyang Shinmun said in an editorial on the day that “the court that decided to return to the office of President Yoon and Minister Chu should confront the situation,” “The government and the ruling party, including Minister Chu, should largely confront the ‘procedural flaws’ pointed out by Lee Gu-dong. ” President Moon, the person in charge of government personnel affairs and the executive director of state affairs, has no choice but to come and take care of the situation. “
The Chosun Ilbo said in the editorial “All the collective assault of the former president of the Wen regime is Gukjeong Nongdan”, “The executive director of the illegality is President Moon. President Moon immediately despised Minister Chu and apologized to the people. “
That day, the Hankyoreh wrote in an editorial that “unless the disciplinary process followed by Minister Chu is judged to be illegal, one should first reflect on this”, but the column published on the same side “Investigation of the living power and prosecution of ‘everlasting power’ “Esau once again emphasized the need to reform the prosecution.
This column mentions investigations involving former Justice Minister Cho Kook, concentration of investigative power on suspicion of intervention in the Ulsan mayoral elections, and meetings with the owners of Chosun and JoongAng Ilbo, saying: “If the prosecution investigates, the media are inflated. He commented that the ‘helical structure’ was activated. “
Copyright © Media Today, unauthorized reproduction and redistribution are prohibited.
[ad_2]
