Controversy over the ‘Min Kyung-wook vote’ The board of directors also said: “Inadequate management”

Controversy over the “voting document” that Min Kyung-wook, a member of the future unification party who had claimed to “administer the elections”, called “evidence”, fell into the hands of the prosecution.

The Supreme Prosecutor’s Office said on Thursday that the Central Election Commission had assigned the Uijeongbu District Prosecutor’s Office for the investigation.

The day before, the Central Election Commission confirmed that ballots issued by Assemblyman Min as “evidence of the April 15 general election” were leaked from the Guri Gyeonggi-do commission and asked prosecutors to investigate.

Suspicious investigation references are “confiscating ballots.” “Request for investigation,” as opposed to “indictment,” means examining the investigation when the suspect cannot be identified.

The National Electoral Commission said: “We kept an electoral bag containing the relevant voting documents and other related documents in the physical training room at the box office (Guri City Gymnasium).
NEC officials said: “The party that presented the remaining ballots as evidence of illegal elections (Min Kyung-wook) should clarify how the ballots were obtained and be responsible for it.” It has become a situation that cannot be free.

It is not known exactly how six of the ballots were lost. There was no closed circuit (CC) television in the exercise room where the ballots were stored, and no surveillance personnel were assigned. For this reason, it is noted that the NEC, which must thoroughly manage the ballots, was neglected.

It seemed that this situation was expected, Senator Min said the same day: “The Central Senate commissioned me to investigate the Great Sword, thank you!”

In addition, the leadership of the Democratic Party, which had refrained from officially mentioning, spoke on this day. President Kim Tae-nyeon said, “It wasn’t that long, so I tried not to answer … Still, it’s a shame to see people talking in the 19th century, and Supreme Council member Park Ju-min criticized:” The party still cannot accept the public sentiment revealed by the general election? “