[ad_1]
Former Sergeant Byun Hee-soo, who was tried forcibly discharged after undergoing a sex change operation, at a press conference held at the Military Rights Center in Mapo-gu, Seoul, on 22 April. January 2020, salutes with tears after making a statement on the forced discharge of the military. Hankook Ilbo Data Photo
Former Sergeant Byun Hee-soo, a transgender tank driver, and Kim Ki-hong, an activist who rejected the dichotomous gender division, turned their backs on the prejudices of the world. Anti-discrimination law legislation, which is the minimum legal safety net to protect sexual minorities like these, has not been adequately debated since it was launched in June last year.
Byun Hee-soo’s death ended as a tribute to an individual member of the legislator.
On the 4th, when the news of the death of former Sergeant Byeon Hee-soo, who was forced to discharge after a sex change operation, is located in front of the representative office of the Justice Party of the National Assembly, A memorial space for Sergeant Byun is prepared. Newsis
The two major parties, the Democratic Party of Korea and the People’s Power, did not position themselves at the party level on the death of Sergeant Byeon. When Hankook Ilbo asked about the position of the match on the 4th, the answer was: “It is difficult to find many problems” and “I need time to think about it”. It wasn’t until the afternoon that the Democratic Party made just a four-line comment on behalf of a youth spokesperson saying, “I feel deeply responsible for a society that has not accepted a person as he is.”
Some lawmakers commemorated Sergeant Byeon with their own voice. Democratic Party lawmaker Kwon In-sook wrote on Facebook: “I am so sorry and I am a sinner. Slow equality laws and anti-discrimination laws are also sinful” and “The National Assembly should be ashamed. It should at least try to prevent such a painful death. ” Democratic Party congressman Lee So-young also said, “I’ve been thinking that what happened to you was absurd and unfair, but when I became a politician, I didn’t participate in the work of correcting it and I forgot.” I do not agree. . “
It was the Justice Party that provided a space for the message and the memorial service at the party level. Spokesman Cho Hye-min noted: “Political circles that need to change society have been busy making hate speech, and the government and the ruling party have also been endorsed.”
Use it just to split the side instead of discussing the invoice
On June 1, 2019, the participants who completed the ‘Seoul Queer Culture Festival’, a festival of gender minorities, are holding a parade in Seoul Square. Hankook Ilbo Data Photo
Politicians sometimes use it as a tool for political struggle instead of solving the LGBT problem. It is a way of uniting the majority with LGBT issues. Ahn Cheol-soo, Seoul mayoral candidate in the third zone, insisted on the “right not to see the queer festival.” Other candidates for mayor of Seoul also indirectly agree or are silent.
Justice Party lawmaker Jang Hye-young, who initiated the anti-discrimination law last year, said in a call with Hankook Ilbo: “Now, it is more egregious to avoid the LGBT issue than to deny it.” “, he pointed.
Had the anti-discrimination law been handled by the National Assembly, Sergeant Byeon might have had other options. The anti-discrimination law proposed in the National Assembly contains content to prevent discrimination that may arise from employment or the use of educational and administrative services for reasons such as gender, disability, race, religion, sexual orientation and gender identity without reasonable reasons.
The anti-discrimination law was introduced on June 30 last year and then presented to the Legislative and Judicial Committee of the National Assembly on September 21. Since then, the National Assembly has never discussed the law against discrimination. Capturing the National Assembly bill information system
However, the anti-discrimination bill initiated by Congressman Chang was referred to the Legislative and Judicial Committee of the National Assembly only in September last year, three months later. However, the bill initiated by the minority party is not being discussed in front of the two major parties.
Representative Jang said, “There has never been a serious discussion about the bill,” he said. Democratic Party lawmaker Lee Sang-min is also preparing to propose an anti-discrimination bill next month, but is fighting opposition from some Protestants.
Jo So-jin reporter [email protected]
News directly edited by Hankook Ilbo can also be viewed on Naver.
Issues that may interest you
[ad_2]
