[ad_1]
Entry 2020.11.05 19:39 | Revision 2020.11.05 19:41
◇ “Gukjeong Nongdan” felony application. Strict judgment “
At a decision hearing held by Professor Jeong at the Seoul Central District Court 25-2 Penal Agreement hearing (Presiding Judges Lim Jeong-yeop, Kwon Seong-su, Kim Sun-hee) from 10 a.m. 5, the indictment was sentenced to 7 years in prison and a fine for the use of non-public information and violation of the Capital Market Law. He requested 900 million won and an additional collection of 16,461,657 won. In addition, he requested the confiscation of two desktop (PC) bodies used to create bogus careers, such as forgery of quotes.
When the prosecution’s final defense began, Ko Hyeong-gon, the head of the anti-corruption investigation department of the Daegu District Prosecutor’s Office, who led the investigation of the “camp father’s family,” was carried out in person. He traveled to and from Daegu and Seoul to attend the trial and hold a trial for Professor Jeong’s trial that takes place every week.
“At that time, considering that the investigation against the incumbent attorney general was a matter of great public interest, we followed due process and investigated far more than any other case,” he said. “The lawyer argues that this investigation was an error due to confirmation bias, but · It was the prosecution for crimes clearly confirmed through the synthesis of physical evidence.”
The elders’ request was made by prosecutor Kang Baek-sin. Prosecutor Kang said: “This case started with the suspicion of living power, and it can be seen as a case similar to that of ‘Gukjeong Nongdan.’ It is the inheritance of the academic school and the inheritance of wealth, and actually, a punishment criminal by hiding the truth. Evasion, “he said.
At the same time, “Cho, the former owner of a social media conglomerate, said, ‘I won’t tell you to stick with Noblesse Oblige, but I told you to obey the law.’ But he pointed out that ‘ironically, this is a case in the one that people of high rank did not obey the law “.
Prosecutor Kang said: “Professor Jeong is the elite class, and the university professor violated the fairness and credibility of entrance examinations in our society, and despite his public status as the spouse of civil jeong, he avoided the obligation to trust blank and accumulate wealth illegally. ” To hide the truth, he violated the personal rights of the president and at the same time obstructed the application of the criminal law.
In addition, he asked: “In accordance with the Criminal Law and the law, look at cells with a hawk’s eye and look at cells under a microscope, examine the substance and truth to rule out reasonable doubts and make a strict judgment on living power.” .
◇ “Typical target investigation” with the purpose of defeating the homeland
On the other hand, Professor Jeong denied all the charges and said: “It is not the accusation, but it seems to be a very typical objective investigation from the point of view of those who do not know how the original investigation begins, like us.”
The lawyer said: “It was an investigation directed with the purpose of falling outside the homeland, and the method was too excessive to find a precedent.” “The prosecution mobilized a forced investigation in full force and it was finally successful, and former Minister Cho could not resist and took off his clothes. He also captured his family. I handed him over to trial.” At the same time, he said, “I am very curious to know how it will be recorded in the history of the Korean prosecution.”
In connection with the accusations of corruption in the entrance exam, the allegations that Professor Jeong interfered with the admissions officer
He refuted that it did not hold.
The lawyer said: “If you look at the public complaint, it says: ‘It interfered with the work of the person in charge of the admission to medical staff, but it is very thorough.’ The work of selecting new students for the medical staff at Seoul National University and Pusan National University is divided into document evaluation data preparation, written data evaluation, and personality / intelligence evaluation. “I don’t know exactly who the victim was who was disturbed. Is it the admissions officer of the medical staff, the admissions office that wrote the basic data, the screening committees at each stage of the interview, or the interviewer who conducted the interview with your daughter Jo-min? “he pointed out.
It is argued that it is not possible to know at what stage the document that Professor Chung presented was specifically interfering with a certain person and creating a risk of obstruction.
The lawyers also emphasized that it is difficult to find related data because this case is an old fact more than 10 years ago, and that it is difficult to confirm the facts because the evidence of the statements is very weak. The lawyer said: “The family of the accused suffered hard-to-find pain and personal reproach due to the investigation of the prosecution’s objective. In addition to the investigative process, I used words intended to criticize (the accused) like a sword. Please look at the case with a cool perspective, “I said.
In particular, regarding the ‘Tongyang University Subpoena’, lawyer Kim Chil-joon said: “As an active method of proving that Professor Jeong has never performed false acts at his home in Bangbae-dong, there is no evidence to confirm that the PC used as a tool at that time is in Bangbae-dong. ” “There is no reason to suppose that the subpoena was forged using the files found here in the manner the prosecution claims.” Furthermore, referring to the computer seizure and search process at Tongyang University, he also pointed to the ‘evidence of illegal collection’ by the prosecution.
In connection with the private equity allegations, he argued that the content of Cho’s fifth son’s nephew, Cho Beom-dong, who was convicted of “embezzlement and fraud”, was not reflected in the complaint. It is argued that it is not reasonable to believe that Professor Jeong invested in funds after learning of this situation.
The lawyer said: “The essence of this case is to invest and suffer losses with a rather naive thought, ‘Would not it be a long-term property, without knowing the true intentions of the forces of manipulation of the capital market?” Emphasized. Regarding the use of undisclosed material information and violations of the Capital Market Law, he said: “The defendant was used for fraudulent and fraudulent transactions.”
◇ Crying Jung Gyeong-Shim “I think the charges will be dropped”
Professor Jung asked for his innocence through a final statement.
Professor Jeong said, “I firmly believe that the charges against me by prosecutors will be dropped and the truth will be revealed. I believe that this hope will be realized for anyone who is outside the (related) law.”
Professor Jeong said, “I realized something during the one-year trial. My family’s life is exceptional when judged by the usual standards. I have been accepting the benefits that are awarded to me without criticism,” he said.
In particular, Professor Jeong complained of resentment and said, “It is too different from the facts and records that I am aware of,” regarding the alleged falsification of the Tong Yang University subpoena, and cried as if the emotions were overwhelming.
On the other hand, on the same day, Professor Jeong was arrested after interfering with procedures, such as insulting a visitor when the number of convictions decreased. At the gamchi trial, which was held separately, the audience said: “I am sorry I disturbed the trial,” and the court decided to “improve the punishment.” However, the trial hearing was prohibited in the future.
Sentencing for the first trial in Professor Jeong’s case will be delivered at 2:00 p.m. on December 23.
