[ad_1]
Chu “Exclusion from duty is justified” Yoon “The prosecution is directly related to neutrality”
Reporter Hansoo Kim hangang @, Reporter Hyerang Park [email protected]
Check-in: 2020-11-30 19:18:38Revision: 2020-11-30 19:36:53Published: 2020-11-30 19:40:31 (p. 4)
Effect of suspension of duties of Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol View of the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul on the 30th, when the date of stay of execution was celebrated. Yunhap news
Amid a fierce confrontation between Justice Minister Choo Mi-ae and Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, Yoon’s “ derogation effect suspension of execution interrogation ” took place in court on Day 30. As the disciplinary committee of the Ministry of Justice will be held against President Yoon on the 2nd, the court’s decision is expected to come out no later than the 1st.
Judicial questioning … The results seem to emerge from the day
Declaration of prosecutors in western part of Busan
The Fourth Administrative Division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Deputy Magistrate Cho Mi-yeon) conducted an interrogation on the case of the suspension of execution of the effect of the removal from the functions of President Yoon, which was carried out since the 11 am on the 30th. The private interrogation ended in more than an hour. Minister Chu and General Yoon did not attend. Lawyer Ok-hyung Lee, who is the representative of Minister Chu, argued that “there is no irreparable harm to Mr. Yoon from the suspension of his duties.” On the other hand, Yoon’s lawyer, Wan-gyu Lee, urged him to cite the request for stay of execution, saying, “In fact, the removal of the president is not a simple individual, but a matter that is directly related to political neutrality, independence and the rule of law of the prosecution. “
The outcome of the trial on the 30th is significant because it is the first court trial on a dispute between Minister Chu and President Yun that has lasted for several months. If the court does not accept Mr. Yun’s request to stay the execution, Mr. Yun will be subject to severe punishment beyond dismissal. The Ministry of Justice will hold a disciplinary commission against President Yun on the 2nd. Minister Chu, who is a disciplinary complainant, cannot participate in the deliberation of the case, but there is a high possibility that the six disciplinary members appointed by the minister are dismissed or dismissed. In this case, Yun is sure to file an objection suit.
If the court accepts Yoon’s request to stay the execution, he will immediately return to the position of attorney general. In this case, President Yoon can take the lead in the main lawsuit filed with the request for temporary injunction on the 25th of last month. However, if the dismissal or dismissal is decided by the disciplinary committee of the Ministry of Justice, regardless of the results of the court’s questioning, Yun is in a position to engage in a court battle in the future while he has been removed from the position of attorney general.
On the other hand, the Busan Western District Prosecutor’s Office announced a statement on the 30th that “the suspension of duties for President Yoon was unfair. The Busan District Prosecutor’s Office said that five days after the Dongbu District Prosecutor’s Office made A statement for the first time between local prosecutors and offices across the country, it was illegal to request disciplinary action against President Yun and suspend the execution of his duties at 18 district attorneys and 40 offices across the country. Review prosecutors from the Busan District Prosecutor’s Office argued that “the complaints were promptly investigated and the party’s opportunity to clarify was not guaranteed, undermining the constitutional principle of due process.”
Reporters Hansoo Kim and Hyerang Park hangang @
