[ad_1]
The reason for disciplining the ‘judge’s document’ was strong,
The situation is reversed when abnormal vigilance is revealed
The courts and the prosecution commission raise their hands successively
Even in the case of the NIS, he was suspended after being revived.
ㅗ Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol will move out of the Supreme Prosecutor’s Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul after finishing his job on the afternoon of the 25th. News 1
Attorney General Yoon Seok-yeol, who had been on the defensive with Justice Minister Chu Mi-ae’s “ super storm ”, who called the job exclusion and the attorney general’s disciplinary provision, returned as a “ great figure ” with a consecutive victory. On the other hand, Minister Chu, who expressed his appreciation for expelling Yun, faces an embarrassing exit with the worst results. The death-to-death match between the two, which began at the beginning of the year, is a phase that ends with a complete victory by President Yoon at the end of the year.
Momentum, etc. Chu Mi-ae was struggling with 3 consecutive losses
At first, Minister Chu, who had a fight, was on the rise. Minister Chu held an emergency press conference on the 24th of last month and announced a request for exclusion and disciplinary action from the chief attorney general of the story, and put pressure on Yun. Among the grounds for the disciplinary action, the suspicion of “ illegal inspection of the Court of Justice ” was a particularly weak point for Yoon. During the time of the Seoul Central District Prosecutor’s Office, Yoon wrote a document titled “Review of Personnel Measures for Mulyagi Judges” and led the investigation of “Judicial Nongshim”, claiming that the judges were disadvantaged in terms of personal. According to the announcement of the Ministry of Justice, it was enough to be criticized for doing similar things in the Prosecutor’s Office, which imposed strict rules on ‘inspection within the Judicial Power’.
Yun had no way to respond to Minister Chu’s attack except by filing an administrative complaint and receiving a court sentence. This is because the Disciplinary Committee of the Prosecutor’s Office of the Ministry of Justice, which will decide on President Yun’s disciplinary action, was in fact controlled by Minister Chu from the composition of the committee to the decision. As President Yoon, it was an unavoidable atmosphere.
However, in the process of requesting inspection and disciplinary action against General Yoon, circumstances that did not follow normal procedure were revealed one after another, creating an opportunity to reverse. It was learned that the provisions of the Inspection Committee, which were obliged to carry out important inspection matters, were revised to voluntary regulations, and the internal disclosure of the prosecutors who were classified on the side of Minister Chu was also followed. It was determined that the prosecutor of the Department of Justice Ryu Hyuk, who is in charge of the prosecution of the Ministry of Justice, was excluded from the decision-making, and the prosecutor Lee Jeong-hwa, who was sent to the office of the prosecutor of the Ministry Justice, also revealed the fact that the ‘report of no crime was removed’.
Prosecutors protested and pointed to the injustice of the process, which is the core of law enforcement. In 59 front-line prosecution offices across the country, meetings of prosecutors were held that pointed out the injustice of the exclusion and the disciplinary claim of President Yun, and rebelled against Minister Chu. Both the Deputy Prosecutor Nam-gwan Cho and the Chief Prosecutor of the Superior Prosecutor’s Office made an unusual voice calling for the withdrawal of the disciplinary action, and even the Deputy Minister of Justice, Koki-yeong, who was assisting Minister Chu, resigned.
The internal complaint and the opposition of the prosecutors reduced Minister Chu’s position, and the Prosecutors Commission of the Ministry of Justice and the courts successively raised their hands. Finally, General Yoon returned to the prosecution after a week of exclusion. On the 1st of this month, the supervision committee of the Ministry of Justice adopted a recommendation that “the request for inspection and disciplinary action by President Yoon of the Ministry of Justice is unfair due to a procedural defect.” Subsequently, the fourth administrative division of the Seoul Administrative Court (Director Mi-yeon Cho) cited the request for suspension of the exclusion of functions, filed by President Yoon against Minister Chu.
Despite successive defeats, Minister Chu pulled out the last card, calling for a disciplinary claim for President Yun. However, in the Disciplinary Commission of Prosecutors of the Ministry of Justice, held twice on the 10th and 15th of this month, the controversy arose again due to procedural violations such as the request for evasion of disciplinary officers. However, the disciplinary committee, made up of officials from Minister Chu, decided on a two-month honest disciplinary action against Yun. President Moon Jae-in, who practically tolerated President Yoon’s policy of seeking disciplinary action, also approved Minister Chu’s request after 14 hours of resolution.
However, the court once again served as an assistant to President Yun. On the 24th, in the case of a request for suspension of the disciplinary provision, Yoon raised his hand again and finally won a complete victory over Minister Chu.
Yoon Seok-yeol revived after being honest in 2013
Within the indictment, there is a story that says “Yun Seok-yeol has survived again” in reference to the past incident where Yoon was demoted and then returned to his splendor. At the time of the National Intelligence Service in 2013, he stated that he was under pressure from “superior” in the process of investigating the National Intelligence Service’s comments, but was relegated after being disciplined for a month for suspension. After joining the team of special prosecutors Park Young-soo, who uncovered Gukjeong Nongdan’s case, President Yoon was revived and, at the same time Moon Jae-in’s government was launched, he was selected as the Central District Prosecutor’s Office of Seoul and assumed the presidency.
Minister Chu, who expressed his thanks to President Moon on the 16th by offering his disciplinary action to President Yoon, did not say anything about his return to President Yoon. A passport official said: “Failure to print ‘Yoon Seok-yeol’ has no choice but to harm not only Chu, but also the entire regime.” The district attorney’s senior prosecutor’s office said: “If the prosecutors, who are classified as close to Minister Chu, reported the facts correctly and worked selflessly, they would not have reached this point.”
Aram ahn reporter [email protected]
Subscribe to the Hankook Ilbo News Naver channel
Balance to see the world, the Hankook Ilbo Copyright © Hankookilbo
[ad_2]
