Calse, admission fee, condolence money …



[ad_1]


Enter 2020.11.11 16:25
2020.11.11 16:37 edit

Material photo from Kyunghyang newspaper.  Reporter Kim Ki-nam

Material photo from Kyunghyang newspaper Reporter Kim Ki-nam

The city of Seoul recently conducted a survey to identify “abnormal transactions” between rental and monthly rental transactions. To avoid the so-called ‘pre-rental roof system’, it involves checking how far the ‘trick’ is in the real housing market, such as signing a deposit-related reverse contract.

It was confirmed on the 11th that the Seoul Metropolitan Government is investigating whether there has been an “ abnormal transaction ” for parties who have conducted actual rental and rental transactions in the past three months, such as landlords, tenants and real estate brokers. since the last 10.




The subject of the survey is 75,000 transactions from July 31 to October 31, and some of them are sampled and conducted by phone or on site. July 31 is the day the revised Housing Lease Protection Act came into effect to guarantee the tenant’s period of residence for at least four years and limit the deposit increase rate to a maximum of 5% per Renew the contract.

The focus of this survey is to understand the extent to which illegal and illegal transactions have taken place since the revised Housing Lease Protection Act was implemented. Recently, as demand for jeonse increased, there have been reports that landlords are demanding abnormal transactions from prospective tenants who are in a deeper ‘Eul’ situation. The Seoul Metropolitan Government launched a detailed investigation classifying the types of transactions.

Chart = Reporter Heo Nam-seol

Chart = Reporter Heo Nam-seol

First of all, there is an indirect contract, which is a type that the landlord usually requires from the pre-tenant who has an urgent need for cheonsei and is likely to violate the law. It is a method of signing a ‘surface contract’ and separately signing an endorsement contract with an additional deposit, as if the upper limit of 5% of the deposit increase stipulated by the Housing Lease Protection Act is maintained.

A case where the landlord actually demands ‘Kalse’ as a fine from the tenant on the condition that he does not use the right to apply for contract renewal under the Housing Lease Protection Act two years later. They sign a contract in the form of a reverse tax, receive one year’s monthly rent (class) in advance, and decide whether or not to return the match based on whether or not they evict after two years.

Also look for cases where the landlord receives a “viewing fee” in exchange for showing the house to a prospective tenant. Such a case is said to have arisen as the spread of Corona 19 and the increased demand for jeonse overlap.

It also investigates the status of the transactions required by the tenants. Cases have been reported, such as asking the landlord for moving expenses on behalf of ‘comfort money’ on the condition of not renewing jeonse’s lease, or requesting priority over other potential tenants from the brokerage office and delivering the call ‘ promotion rate ‘.

[ad_2]