[ad_1]
2020.09.29 18:34 entry
2020.09.29 21:53 edit
Denial of the Ministry of Defense in message“There are no words to kill … Comprehensive intelligence analysis”Announcement of the results of the investigation of “Voluntary North Korea”
It’s been a week since an official from the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries was killed by the North Korean military off the coast of South Hwanghae province, but only the outline of the incident was revealed, and the real truth is in a maze . On the 29th, the Maritime Police Agency released the results of an interim investigation called a “voluntary visit to North Korea,” but questions remain about key issues such as North Korea’s superior order and whether the body was damaged. North Korea is consistent with the non-response to a joint investigation between the two Koreas to reveal the truth.
What has become relatively clear is whether the deceased official A, 47, has fled North Korea. On the same day, the maritime police said that Mr. A made a voluntary attempt to defect to North Korea due to the fact that it was difficult to reach North Korea without artificial efforts due to the current tidal flow at that time.
However, the rest of the parts were not clearly organized. In particular, the key question is whether the North Korean side burned the body.
On the 24th, the army announced on the 24th that “North Korea has confirmed that it has committed a volley of gunfire and body burning on the 22nd of the Koreans found in North Korean waters.” However, in an advisory the next day, the North Koreans claimed that only the floats in which A was traveling were burned, and that the body was not found.
That day, Ho-young Joo, representative of the People’s Power, said: “The Ministry of National Defense confirmed that he was asked to burn condensed milk (oil).” On the other hand, Democratic Party lawmakers withheld the ruling, saying: “It is necessary to investigate whether only floating objects were burned as claimed by North Korea, or even bodies were burned as in our analysis.”
It is also a problem whether the higher order of North Korea or not. North Korea said the person it decided to kill was the suit from the North Korean repression ship. Previously, the Defense Ministry stated that it was “by order of the leadership.”
On that day, some media reported that the military intercepted and captured the content of North Korea’s military communications at the time of the incident, quoting the words of the participants in the private report of the National Assembly Defense Committee. The lawsuit was ordered to “kill” through Naval Command, and “I’ll ask again. Kill him? For real?”
Still ‘question mark’, as if the body was damaged … North Korea’s silence in a joint investigation
After that, there were reports of “murders” at the scene. National Assembly Defense Commissioner Min Hong-cheol said on tbs radio that day: “So in the process of reporting ‘how should I handle it?’ However, the Defense Ministry said that “there is no mention of ‘killing’ in the information obtained by the military.” It is unclear whether the North Korean military attempted to rescue Mr. A prior to the assassination.
The army is reviewing the comprehensive analysis process of the information collected so far. However, the existing position is unlikely to be changed because the new intelligence is not analyzed further.
It is unclear if the body of Mr. A. can be found. The navy and others are searching the southern Northern Limit Line (NLL) and North Korea is also working on a search. However, considering the fact that it may have been washed up off the coast of North Korea or China, observations suggest that the chance of finding the body is low. If the body was burned, the chance is even lower.
Joint research is the channel through which these questions can be resolved. However, North Korea has not responded to the government’s request for a joint investigation for a third day. It has not responded on the sixth day to a request to restore the military communication network.
