[ad_1]
▲ Compared to last year’s protests against racial profiling, CNN captures public opinion on the passive response of police to protests on Capitol Hill. | |
Ⓒ CNN |
See related photos |
When supporters of the president of the United States, Donald Trump, stormed the Capitol, the lax response from the security authorities who failed to stop him was on the cutting board. Some say they compare it to the harsh crackdown on protests against racial discrimination last year.
On the 7th (local time), supporters of President Trump flocked to the Capitol to interfere with the certification of the United States Congress that Joe Biden had won the presidential election. However, the police at the scene responded passively and could not prevent the intrusion of the protesters.
Protesters sat in Senate seats or occupied the office of President Nancy Pelosi and stole memorabilia displayed inside the Capitol. However, there were ridiculous scenes of some policemen taking photos together, instead of blocking the protesters.
The Police requested the support of the National Guard, but due to the delay in the approval of the Ministry of Defense, they arrived at the scene two hours after the invasion of the protesters.
The CNN broadcast said: “The intrusion into the House of Parliament was like a coup.” But compared to last year’s ‘Black Lives Matters’ protests that were suppressed with tear gas, violence and mass arrests, the response was different. .
The black human rights group ‘Black Lives Are Precious Global Network’ issued a statement and argued that it was “another example of hypocrisy in the response of the US public authorities to the protests.”
“When blacks protest to protect their lives, they face police or state defense forces using offensive firearms, tear gas and combat helmets.” “If the black protesters tried to break into the Capitol, they hit or shot them. I’m sure I will,” he criticized.
The protest against racism triggered by the death of a black man, George Floyd, last year in violence by the white police, unlike the supporters of President Trump, who is mostly white, was more severely repressed due to the large number of black participants.
Because of the color of the skin … they are still the ‘two Americas’
▲ Protesters Entering the United States Capitol and Police Officers Watching It | |
Ⓒ AP = Yonhap News |
See related photos |
The NBC broadcast also noted: “Last May, police fired tear gas and rubber bullets at racist protesters” and “President Trump encouraged protesters to become targets in this country.”
“There is a suspicion that there is a difference in the way we responded to the invasion of the Capitol and the protest against racism last year,” he said. “Black society has fallen into anger and frustration.”
The National Association for the Improvement of Black Perception (NAACP) said: “This event shows two Americas” and said: “The new year is bright, but you are still subject to two different types of justice and security depending on the color of your skin “.
Popular actors also added voices. Marvel series <캡틴 아메리카>Chris Evans, the protagonist of the film, said: “If the protesters who stormed the Capitol were not white, I would think of a disaster.”
Criticism also arose in the world of sports. “If black people were meddling on Capitol Hill or protesting outside, it would have lit the fire,” said Lloyd Pearce of the NBA’s Atlanta Hawks. “Black people in this country have been discriminating against law enforcement.” Nothing will change until you truly admit that you are going through. A sad reality, “he criticized the double security standard.
However, the parliamentary police are in a different position. “We have defended ourselves bravely,” Stephen Sund said, saying: “It was a situation that the protesters had not experienced in the last 30 years, like attacking with iron pipes and chemicals.”